Hi Yuri, In the logs I see
2014-10-24T20:08:46.258 INFO:teuthology.task.install:Package version is 0.67.11-26-g6a90775-1precise which would explain why it fails. If the cluster is running dumpling and an upgrade to a firefly client tries to create an erasure coded pool, that will fail with -95 as expected. Cheers On 25/10/2014 10:30, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > Via crontab treuthology-suite cl > > On Saturday, October 25, 2014, Loic Dachary <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > [cc'ing ceph-devel for archive] > > Hi, > > I see a lot of errors with > > #define EOPNOTSUPP 95 /* Operation not supported on transport > endpoint */ > > 2014-10-24T20:26:54.335 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.plana63.stdout:[ RUN > ] LibRadosAioEC.SimpleWrite > 2014-10-24T20:26:56.737 > INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.plana63.stdout:test/librados/aio.cc:1634: Failure > 2014-10-24T20:26:56.737 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.plana63.stdout:Value > of: test_data.init() > 2014-10-24T20:26:56.737 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.plana63.stdout: > Actual: "create_one_ec_pool(test-rados-api-plana63-14645-33) failed: error > rados_mon_command erasure-code-profile set name:testprofile failed with error > -95" > 2014-10-24T20:26:56.738 > INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.plana63.stdout:Expected: "" > 2014-10-24T20:26:56.738 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.plana63.stdout:[ > FAILED ] LibRadosAioEC.SimpleWrite (2403 ms) > 2014-10-24T20:26:56.738 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.plana63.stdout:[ RUN > ] LibRadosAioEC.SimpleWritePP > 2014-10-24T20:26:59.141 > INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.plana63.stdout:test/librados/aio.cc:1669: Failure > 2014-10-24T20:26:59.142 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.plana63.stdout:Value > of: test_data.init() > 2014-10-24T20:26:59.142 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.plana63.stdout: > Actual: "create_one_ec_pool(test-rados-api-plana63-14645- > > which indeed suggests that the client is trying to create an erasure > coded pool in a cluster that does not support it. But since it looks like > it's upgrading from firefly to a later version, I don't understand why that > would be a problem. > > How did that get scheduled ? > > Cheers > > On 25/10/2014 08:37, Yuri Weinstein wrote: > > Not sure what's going on with it, thx. > > > > It's unusual in a way that upgrades a client first. > > > > > http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/teuthology-2014-10-24_17:05:01-upgrade:firefly:singleton-firefly-distro-basic-multi/569532/teuthology.log > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
