Hi Yuri, I analyzed the errors from the rbd run at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-08_10:36:47-rbd-giant-backports-testing-basic-vps/ and summarized my findings in the description of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501
It would be great if you could let me know if these look familiar. They all seem to relate to something that's not from the backports, except for http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10513 because it looks new. Cheers On 08/01/2015 17:10, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Tamil, > > The test completed with a number of failures. I compared them with the latest > giant / rbd run (which is on the red hat private lab). The number of failure > is comparable (40 failed out of 102 january 6th 2015). However the failures > are mostly different and I'm not sure what to do next. > > http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/teuthology-2015-01-06_02:00:01-rbd-giant-distro-basic-magna/ > shows > > Command failed on magna094 with status 1: 'sudo yum install ceph-radosgw-0.87 > -y' > > (a number of times) > > Command failed on magna065 with status 1: 'adjust-ulimits ceph-coverage > /home/ubuntu/cephtest/archive/coverage daemon-helper term qemu-system-x86_64 > -enable-kvm -nographic -m 4096 -drive > file=/home/ubuntu/cephtest/qemu/base.client.0.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=virtio > -cdrom /home/ubuntu/cephtest/qemu/client.0.iso -fsdev > local,id=log,path=/home/ubuntu/cephtest/archive/qemu/client.0,security_model=none > -device virtio-9p-pci,fsdev=log,mount_tag=test_log -drive > file=rbd:rbd/client.0.0:id=0,format=raw,if=virtio,cache=writethrough -drive > file=rbd:rbd/client.0.1:id=0,format=raw,if=virtio,cache=writethrough' > > (a few times). > > On 08/01/2015 10:39, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The giant-backports branch has been built by gitbuilders tonight >> >> http://gitbuilder.sepia.ceph.com/gitbuilder-ceph-deb-trusty-amd64-basic/#origin/giant-backports >> etc. >> >> and I scheduled a rbd suite with >> >> ./virtualenv/bin/teuthology-suite --teuthology-branch giant --suite rbd >> --suite-branch giant --machine-type vps --distro ubuntu --email >> [email protected] --owner [email protected] --ceph giant-backports >> >> which shows at >> >> http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-01-08_10:36:47-rbd-giant-backports-testing-basic-vps/ >> >> To be continued ! >> >> On 07/01/2015 15:02, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> Hi Tamil, >>> >>> I've merged / integrated the giant backports found at >>> >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3186 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3178 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/2954 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3191 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3168 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3289 >>> >>> into >>> >>> http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph/commit/0ea20e6c51208d6710f469454ab3f964bfa7c9d2 >>> >>> and successfully ran make check on it >>> >>> http://workbench.dachary.org:8080/projects/10?ref=giant-backports >>> >>> If I'm not mistaken the next step would be to run teuthology. If I'm to do >>> it, would you be so kind as to let me know which suites are most relevant ? >>> If someone else will take care of it, should I push the integration branch >>> somewhere ? >>> >>> Cheers >>> >> > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
