On Wed 14-01-15 10:42:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Since 018a17bdc865 ("bdi: reimplement bdev_inode_switch_bdi()") the
> block device code writes out all dirty data whenever switching the
> backing_dev_info for a block device inode.  But a block device inode can
> only be dirtied when it is in use, which means we only have to write it
> out on the final blkdev_put, but not when doing a blkdev_get.
> 
> Factoring out the write out from the bdi list switch prepares from
> removing the list switch later in the series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  Looks good. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>

                                                                Honza

> ---
>  fs/block_dev.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
> index b48c41b..026ca7b 100644
> --- a/fs/block_dev.c
> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,17 @@ inline struct block_device *I_BDEV(struct inode *inode)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(I_BDEV);
>  
> +static void bdev_write_inode(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> +     spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> +     while (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
> +             spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> +             WARN_ON_ONCE(write_inode_now(inode, true));
> +             spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> +     }
> +     spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Move the inode from its current bdi to a new bdi.  Make sure the inode
>   * is clean before moving so that it doesn't linger on the old bdi.
> @@ -56,16 +67,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(I_BDEV);
>  static void bdev_inode_switch_bdi(struct inode *inode,
>                       struct backing_dev_info *dst)
>  {
> -     while (true) {
> -             spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> -             if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY)) {
> -                     inode->i_data.backing_dev_info = dst;
> -                     spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> -                     return;
> -             }
> -             spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> -             WARN_ON_ONCE(write_inode_now(inode, true));
> -     }
> +     spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> +     WARN_ON_ONCE(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY);
> +     inode->i_data.backing_dev_info = dst;
> +     spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>  }
>  
>  /* Kill _all_ buffers and pagecache , dirty or not.. */
> @@ -1464,9 +1469,11 @@ static void __blkdev_put(struct block_device *bdev, 
> fmode_t mode, int for_part)
>               WARN_ON_ONCE(bdev->bd_holders);
>               sync_blockdev(bdev);
>               kill_bdev(bdev);
> -             /* ->release can cause the old bdi to disappear,
> -              * so must switch it out first
> +             /*
> +              * ->release can cause the queue to disappear, so flush all
> +              * dirty data before.
>                */
> +             bdev_write_inode(bdev->bd_inode);
>               bdev_inode_switch_bdi(bdev->bd_inode,
>                                       &default_backing_dev_info);
>       }
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to