Hi Yuri,

It would be great if the analysis you compile daily was machine readable. For 
instance, in a mail you sent to ceph-qa I read

'701575', '701576', '701582', '701590' - known issue
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543

"FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num)"

(duplicate of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10430)

which could be something like:

'701575', '701576', '701582', '701590': http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10543 
FAILED assert(m_seed < old_pg_num)

or any other format you find easier to use consistently. 

The reason I ask is because it would help me write a script that associates 
redmine tickets to your findings, in the context of backporting. It's just an 
idea, not a request ;-)

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to