Hi,

Note that you also need to update 

https://github.com/dachary/ceph-erasure-code-corpus/blob/master/v0.85-764-gf3a1532/non-regression.sh

to include non regression tests for the most common cases of the SHEC plugin 
encoding / decoding. This is run by make check (this repository is a submodule 
of Ceph). It helps make sure that content encoded / decoded with a given 
version of the plugin can be encoded / decoded exactly in the same way by all 
future versions.

Cheers

On 06/01/2015 12:49, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote:
> Dear Loic,
> 
> I'm Takeshi Miyamae, one of the authors of SHEC's blueprint.
> 
> Shingled Erasure Code (SHEC)
> https://wiki.ceph.com/Planning/Blueprints/Hammer/Shingled_Erasure_Code_(SHEC)
> 
> We have revised our blueprint shown in the last CDS to extend our erasure code
> layouts and describe the guideline for choosing SHEC among various EC plugins.
> We believe the blueprint now answers all the comments given at the CDS.
> 
> In addition, we would like to ask for your advice on the schedule of our 
> github
> pull request. More specifically, we would like to know its deadline for Hammer
> release.
> (As we have not really completed our verification of SHEC, we are wondering if
> we should make it open for early preview.)
> 
> Thank you in advance,
> Takeshi Miyamae
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to