On 10/02/2015 17:19, Yuri Weinstein wrote:
> Hi Loic
> 
> I was thinking that as soon as one of the branches is declared "ready" we 
> will merge *-backports with the main branch and execute appropriate set of 
> suites as we run them in the Octo lab for released branches.
>

Ok.

> For dumpling:
> rados
> rbd
> rgw
> fs
> ceph-deploy
> upgrade/dumpling
> 
> For giant:
> rados
> rbd
> rgw
> fs
> krbd
> kcephfs
> knfs
> haddop
> samba
> rest
> multimds
> multi-version
> upgrade/giant
> powecycle
> 
> Not sure if we need to run more tests, e.g. giant-x kind of suites for 
> upgrades.
> 
> Do you agree with this plan? 

Yes !

Cheers

> 
> Thx
> YuriW
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Loic Dachary" <[email protected]>
> To: "Yuri Weinstein" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Ceph Development" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 7:25:55 AM
> Subject: dumpling & giant backports update
> 
> Hi Yuri,
> 
> The dumpling integration branch 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/dumpling-backports is ready for Josh and 
> Sam and we are expecting approval from Yehuda (the details are here 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10560).
> 
> The giant integration branch 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/giant-backports is ready for Sam and we 
> are expecting approval from Josh and Yehuda (the details are here 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10501).
> 
> It is likely that we get approval for one branch or the other in the next 
> 48h. When we do, I assume you will be conducting your own round of testing, 
> using the dumpling-backports and/or giant-backports branch. Do you have a 
> list of suites you plan to run already ? I'm also curious to understand who 
> will be analyzing the results and ultimately declare that it is ready to be 
> released.
> 
> Cheers
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to