On 10/02/2015 18:19, Yuri Weinstein wrote:> 
> Loic,
> 
> The only difference between options if we run suits on merged dumpling vs 
> dumpling-backports first - is time.
> We will have to run suites on the final branch after the merge anyway.

Could you explain why ? After merging dumpling and dumpling-backports will be 
exactly the same.

> 
> Unless I hear otherwise, I will schedule suites to run on dumpling-backports 
> first (as you are suggesting, with higher priority) and then assuming that we 
> resolved all issues, we will run on the dumpling merged. 
> 
> Sage, pls correct if this is not what has to be done.
> 
> 
> Thx
> YuriW
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Loic Dachary" <[email protected]>
> To: "Yuri Weinstein" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "Ceph Development" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:05:31 AM
> Subject: dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 ready for QE
> 
> Hi Yuri,
> 
> The dumpling integration branch for v0.67.12 as found at 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/dumpling-backports has been approved by 
> Yehuda, Josh and Sam and is ready for QE. 
> 
> For the record, the head is 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/3944c77c404c4a05886fe8276d5d0dd7e4f20410
> 
> I think it would be best for the QE tests to use the dumpling-backports. The 
> alternative would be to merge dumpling-backports into dumpling. However, 
> since testing may take a long time and require more patches, it probably is 
> better to not do that iterative process on the dumpling branch itself. As it 
> is now, there already are a number of commits in the dumpling branch that 
> should really be in the dumpling-backports: they do not belong to v0.67.11 
> and are going to be released in v0.67.12. In the future though, the dumpling 
> branch will only receive commits that have been carefully tested and all the 
> integration work will be on the dumpling-backports branch exclusively. So 
> that third parties do not have to worry that the dumpling branch contains 
> commits that have not been tested yet.
> 
> Cheers
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to