Sage,

we use apache as a filter for security and additional functionality
reasons. I do like the idea, but we'd need some kind of interface to
filter/modify/process requests.

Best regards
Axel Dunkel

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Sage Weil
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2015 20:32
An: [email protected]; [email protected]
Betreff: who is using radosgw with civetweb?

Hey,

We are considering switching to civetweb (the embedded/standalone rgw web
server) as the primary supported RGW frontend instead of the current
apache + mod-fastcgi or mod-proxy-fcgi approach.  "Supported" here means
both the primary platform the upstream development focuses on and what the
downstream Red Hat product will officially support.

How many people are using RGW standalone using the embedded civetweb
server instead of apache?  In production?  At what scale?  What
version(s) (civetweb first appeared in firefly and we've backported most
fixes).

Have you seen any problems?  Any other feedback?  The hope is to (vastly)
simplify deployment.

Thanks!
sage
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to