Hi Abhishek,

On 29/03/2015 06:42, Abhishek L wrote:
> 
> Loic Dachary writes:
> 
>> Hi Abhishek,
>>
>> Looking at the last two issues marked as needing backport to giant:
>>
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=68
>>
>> (this link is at the top of 
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO) I'm not sure what 
>> to do about http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10643. The problem is that it 
>> consistently shows up when testing upgrades that involve giant. We want to 
>> be sure Giant can be upgraded to Hammer, therefore we need to keep testing 
>> the upgrades at least for a month or two after Hammer is released to catch 
>> border cases. I think issue 10643 needs to be fixed and included in 0.87.2 
>> so that we can have clean upgrade tests, otherwise it will mean more work 
>> for people watching over the upgrade suites (I mean Yuri here ;-). And wif 
>> 10643 is included we can squeeze http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10153 in as 
>> well, I think.
>>
>> Once this is dealt with and you're done with 
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11259 that you found when running the rgw 
>> suite at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11153#rgw, 0.87.2 should be good, 
>> from our point of view (the point of view of backporters) and we can move to 
>> the "asking approval" step of the workflow ( 
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11153#Workflow ). 
> 
> For this issue, I haven't been able to find out the cause yet, there
> seemed to be only one patch that landed in giant related to quotas,
> however the test seemed to have failed even before that. I've updated
> the tracker with this.

It would be interesting to schedule this test once again to check if it shows 
up consistently or not (see 
http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/HOWTO_run_integration_and_upgrade_tests#Re-scheduling-failed-or-dead-jobs-from-an-existing-suite
 for information about doing that).

>>
>> What do you think ?
> 
> Overall sounds good. 
> 

Cool :-)

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to