QE validation is complete and this release is ready for publishing.

(Greg, I assumed that you approved this release with failures in knfs suite re: 
unresolved #11789, marked for v0.94.3 backport)

Summary of all tests performed for this releases and notes can be found in 
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492 .

Thx
YuriW

----- Original Message -----
From: "Loic Dachary" <l...@dachary.org>
To: "Yuri Weinstein" <ywein...@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek L" 
<abhishek.lekshma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 5:42:12 AM
Subject: hammer branch for v0.94.2 ready for QE

Hi Yuri,

The hammer branch for v0.94.2 as found at 
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/hammer has been approved by Greg, Yehuda, 
Josh and Sam and is ready for QE. For the record, the head is 
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/63832d4039889b6b704b88b86eaba4aadcfceb2e 
and the details of the tests run are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492

Note that it has two more commits compared to what you tested before:

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/293affe992118ed6e04f685030b2d83a794ca624 
fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11622
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/a43d24861089a02f3b42061e482e05016a0021f6 
fixing http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11604

which address two blockers that you listed at 
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11492#QE-Validation

These two new commits only have influence, directly or indirectly, on rgw. They 
do not require or deserve a new run of the rados, fs or rbd suite because none 
of them depend on rgw, directly or indirectly.

The other two issues listed as blockers are

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11613#note-4 do not need a backport to hammer
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11591 is a teuthology related issue that can be 
worked around and does not need to be a blocker for hammer

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre







--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to