On 07/19/2015 05:28 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: > I think it achieves the same thing and is less error prone in the case of > backports. The risk is that upgrading from v0.94.2-34 to the version with > this change will fail because the conditions are satisified (it thinks all > versions after v0.94.2 have the change). But the odds of having a test > machine with this specific version already installed are close to > non-existent. The odds of us picking the wrong number and ending up with > something that's either too high or too small are higher. > > What do you think ? >
I think this is great, thanks for proposing it. We should also write our convention down someplace (SubmittingPatches, or the wiki, or something) - Ken -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
