-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Somnath,

I'm having a hard time with your slide deck. Am I understanding
correctly that the default Hammer install was performed on SSDs with
co-located journals, but the optimized code was performed on the same
SSDs but the journal was in NVRAM? If so I'm having a hard time
understanding how these tests can be comparable. I really like the
performance gains you are seeing, but I'm trying to understand how
much the optimized code alone helps performance.

Thanks,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Mailvelope v1.0.2
Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com
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=wcJB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----------------
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904  C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1


On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Somnath Roy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Here is the link of the document I presented in today's performance meeting.
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lCoLpFRjD8t_YCeHyWDV7ddv7ZkwfETgyjUzXw0-ttU/edit?usp=sharing
>
> It has the benchmark result of the filestore changes I proposed earlier for 
> the ceph write path optimization.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Somnath
>
> ________________________________
>
> PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this electronic mail message is 
> intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If the 
> reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
> that you have received this message in error and that any review, 
> dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly 
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
> the sender by telephone or e-mail (as shown above) immediately and destroy 
> any and all copies of this message in your possession (whether hard copies or 
> electronically stored copies).
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to