On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Loic Dachary <l...@dachary.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I wen thru all pull request looking for those not related to anything (like > having "bug fix" without "core" or "rgw"). Now that there are many labels, > it's not trivial for someone not used to Ceph to sort out what's what. We > really have three kinds of labels: > > * those that relate the pull request to an area / component of Ceph (rgw, > core, etc.) > * those used to remember at what stage of QA the pull request is (wip-* and > needs*qa) > * those that describe the kind of pull request (cleanup, bug fix, > performance etc.) > > To help reading the label I prefixed the names of rgw, core, etc. with > "related to". If someone think that's not helpful or too long to read, feel > free to revert, it's just a proposal.
You broke all my bookmarked searches. :( I've updated them now but I'm really not sure this change is helpful — in particular, we don't need these labels to make sense to people who aren't used to Ceph and it's impossible to have them quickly auto-complete now with a long shared prefix across them all... -Greg > > Cheers > > P.S. For backport snippets that set the component to "core" we'll need to > change that to "related to core" instead. Not too much of an inconvenience > IMHO but ... > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
