On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:51 AM, David Disseldorp <dd...@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:57:46 +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:37 PM, David Disseldorp <dd...@suse.de> wrote:
> ...
>> > Ping, any feedback on the patch?
>>
>> The patch itself looks OK, except for the part where you rename a local
>> variable for no reason, AFACT.
>
> Thanks for the feedback Ilya. I presume you're referring to the pagelist
> -> req_pagelist rename - I'll drop that change and send an update.

Also, the prefix for net/ceph patches is libceph.

>
>> We've discussed some of this last week.  As it is, all rbd image
>> properties are stored in omap, so PR info strings stored in xattrs is
>> something different, but it should be fine for now.  I'd rather not
>> merge any kernel patches related to rbd-target work until we see
>> a complete patchset though.  There's been a lot of back and forth
>> between Mike, Christoph and target people and the general approach had
>> changed at least twice, so I'd like to wait for things to settle down.
>
> I understand the desire to wait on any RBD-target changes until upstream
> consensus has been reached, but I'd argue that this change is isolated,
> and complementary to the existing SETXATTR / CMPXATTR support.

That's true, but we already have a bunch of unused code in net/ceph,
which was added using precisely this reasoning, so I'm a bit hesitant.

Thanks,

                Ilya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to