Hi Benjamin, [auto build test ERROR on jlayton/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Benjamin-Coddington/locks-introduce-locks_lock_inode_wait/20151022-233848 config: x86_64-allnoconfig (attached as .config) reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64 All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:17:0, from include/linux/memcontrol.h:22, from include/linux/swap.h:8, from include/linux/suspend.h:4, from arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c:12: >> include/linux/fs.h:1234:19: error: redefinition of 'locks_lock_file_wait' static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl) ^ include/linux/fs.h:1181:19: note: previous definition of 'locks_lock_file_wait' was here static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl) ^ include/linux/fs.h: In function 'locks_lock_file_wait': >> include/linux/fs.h:1236:9: error: implicit declaration of function >> 'locks_lock_inode_wait' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] return locks_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl); ^ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors make[2]: *** [arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.s] Error 1 make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors. make[1]: *** [prepare0] Error 2 make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors. make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 vim +/locks_lock_file_wait +1234 include/linux/fs.h 1228 1229 static inline int flock_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl) 1230 { 1231 return flock_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl); 1232 } 1233 > 1234 static inline int locks_lock_file_wait(struct file *filp, struct > file_lock *fl) 1235 { > 1236 return locks_lock_inode_wait(file_inode(filp), fl); 1237 } 1238 1239 struct fasync_struct { --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
.config.gz
Description: Binary data
