On 03/12/2015, Somnath Roy wrote: > Yes, I posted the new result after adding -O2 in the compiler flag and it > shows almost no overhead with unique_ptr. > I will add the test of adding to list overhead and start implementing the new > interface. > But, regarding my other point of changing all the objecstore interfaces (my > first mail on this mail chain in case you have missed) taking Transaction, > any thought of that ? > Should we reconsider having two queue_transaction interface ?
As I understand it, the concern with switching to unique_ptr was that the callee
would move from the reference without this being known to the caller.
Would it make sense to pass as an RValue reference (i.e. TransactionRef&&)? That
way the compiler should demand that the callers explicitly use std::move on the
reference they're holding, documenting at the site of the call that they're
willing to give up ownership.
--
Senior Software Engineer Red Hat Storage, Ann Arbor, MI, US
IRC: Aemerson@{RedHat, OFTC, Freenode}
0x80F7544B90EDBFB9 E707 86BA 0C1B 62CC 152C 7C12 80F7 544B 90ED BFB9
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
