Hi,
Is there any mechanism inside the rgw that can detect faulty endpoints for a configuration with multiple endpoints? Is there any advantage related with the number of replication endpoints? Can I expect improved replication performance (the more synchronization rgws = the faster replication)? W dniu wtorek, 16 lipca 2019 Casey Bodley <[email protected]> napisał(a): > We used to have issues when a load balancer was in front of the sync > endpoints, because our http client didn't time out stalled connections. > Those are resolved in luminous, but we still recommend using the radosgw > addresses directly to avoid shoveling data through an extra proxy. > Internally, sync is already doing a round robin over that list of > endpoints. On the other hand, load balancers give you some extra > flexibility, like adding/removing gateways without having to update the > global multisite configuration. > > On 7/16/19 2:52 PM, P. O. wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have multisite RGW setup with one zonegroup and two zones. Each zone >> has one endpoint configured like below: >> >> "zonegroups": [ >> { >> ... >> "is_master": "true", >> "endpoints": ["http://192.168.100.1:80";], >> "zones": [ >> { >> "name": "primary_1", >> "endpoints": ["http://192.168.100.1:80";], >> }, >> { >> "name": "secondary_1", >> "endpoints": ["http://192.168.200.1:80";], >> } >> ], >> >> My question is what is the best practice with configuring synchronization >> endpoints? >> >> 1) Should endpoints be behind load balancer? For example two >> synchronization endpoints per zone, and only load balancers address in >> "endpoints" section? >> 2) Should endpoints be behind Round-robin DNS? >> 3) Can I set RGWs addresses directly in endpoints section? For example: >> >> "zones": [ >> { >> "name": "primary_1", >> "endpoints": ["http://192.168.100.1:80";, http://192.168.100.2:80], >> }, >> { >> "name": "secondary_1", >> "endpoints": ["http://192.168.200.1:80";, http://192.168.200.2:80], >> } >> >> Is there any advantages of third option? I mean speed up of >> synchronization, for example. >> >> What recommendations do you have with the configuration of the endpoints >> in prod environments? >> >> Best regards, >> Dun F. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
