They are Samsung 860 EVO 2TB SSDs. The Dell R740xd servers have dual Intel Gold 6130 CPUs and dual SAS controllers with 6 SSDs each. Top shows around 20-25% of a core being used by each OSD daemon. I am using erasure coding with crush-failure-domain=host k=3 m=2.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 1:37 PM Drew Weaver <drew.wea...@thenap.com> wrote: > I was told by someone at Red Hat that ISCSI performance is still several > magnitudes behind using the client / driver. > > Thanks, > -Drew > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Fish <lordci...@gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 1:27 PM > To: Ryan <rswago...@gmail.com> > Cc: ceph-users <ceph-us...@ceph.com> > Subject: [ceph-users] Re: iSCSI write performance > > Are you using Erasure Coding or replication? What is your crush rule? > What SSDs and CPUs? Does each OSD use 100% of a core or more when writing? > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 1:22 PM Ryan <rswago...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I'm in the process of testing the iscsi target feature of ceph. The > cluster is running ceph 14.2.4 and ceph-iscsi 3.3. It consists of 5 hosts > with 12 SSD OSDs per host. Some basic testing moving VMs to a ceph backed > datastore is only showing 60MB/s transfers. However moving these back off > the datastore is fast at 200-300MB/s. > > > > What should I be looking at to track down the write performance issue? > In comparison with the Nimble Storage arrays I can see 200-300MB/s in both > directions. > > > > Thanks, > > Ryan > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an > > email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an > email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
