What about hardlinks, are there any of those? Are there lots of directories or tiny (<4k) files? Also, size=2 is not very safe. You want size=3, min_size=2 if you are doing replication.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 6:15 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello. > > I'm using the Nautilus Ceph version for some huge folder with approximately > 1.7TB of files.I created the filesystem and started to copy files via rsync. > > However, I've had to stop the process, because Ceph shows me that the new > size of the folder is almost 6TB. I double checked the replicated size and it > is 2. I double checked the rsync options and I didn't copy the files followed > by symlinks. > > How would it be possible to explain the extreme difference between the size > of the original folder and CephFS? > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
