Hi *,
I have 2 virtual one-node-clusters configured for multisite RGW. In
the beginning the replication actually worked for some hundred MB or
so, and then it stopped. In the meantime I wiped both RGWs twice to
make sure the configuration is right (including wiping all pools
clean). I don't see any errors in the logs but nothing happens on the
secondary site. Both clusters are healthy, RGWs run with https.
Uploading data directly to the secondary site also works, so the
configuration seems ok to me.
These is the current rgw status:
---snip---
primary:~ # radosgw-admin sync status
realm c7d5fd30-9c06-46a1-baf4-497f95bf3abc (hamburg)
zonegroup 68adec15-aace-403d-bd63-f5182a6437b1 (zg-hamburg)
zone 0fb33fa1-8110-4179-ae45-acf5f5f825c5 (z-primary)
metadata sync no sync (zone is master)
secondary:~ # radosgw-admin sync status
2020-09-17T09:34:59.593+0200 7fdd3e706a40 1 Cannot find zone
id=93ece7a6-beef-4f4e-841a-60ba0405f192 (name=z-secondary), switching
to local zonegroup configuration
realm c7d5fd30-9c06-46a1-baf4-497f95bf3abc (hamburg)
zonegroup 68adec15-aace-403d-bd63-f5182a6437b1 (zg-hamburg)
zone 93ece7a6-beef-4f4e-841a-60ba0405f192 (z-secondary)
metadata sync syncing
full sync: 64/64 shards
full sync: 3 entries to sync
incremental sync: 0/64 shards
metadata is behind on 64 shards
behind shards:
[0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]
data sync source: 0fb33fa1-8110-4179-ae45-acf5f5f825c5 (z-primary)
syncing
full sync: 0/128 shards
incremental sync: 128/128 shards
data is caught up with source
---snip---
Since the data was not replicated I ran a 'radosgw-admin metadata sync
run --source-zone=z-primary' but it never finishes. If I do the same
with data it will show that all shards are behind on data but nothing
will happen either.
I also don't understand the 'Cannot find zone
id=93ece7a6-beef-4f4e-841a-60ba0405f192 (name=z-secondary), switching
to local zonegroup configuration' message but this didn't break the
replication in the first attempt, so I ignored it. Or is this
something I should fix first (if yes, how)?
Can anyone point me to what's going on here? I can provide more
details if necessary, just let me know.
Thank you!
Eugen
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
