Hi Sagara,

did you collect the output of "ceph -w | grep '3\.b'" while the PG was 
deep-scrubbed? Please open a new thread with the error message in the subject 
line. This should draw the attention of someone with internal knowledge. 
Include a short description of how this situation came about with the 
deep-scrub errors and log messages.

The problem is, that no objects are reported as lost or damaged. Therefore, I 
do not believe that the usual actions will help, which would include things 
like marking unfound objects as lost. This doesn't apply to your case.

If you know where data access fails on the file system, you can move the folder 
to a "parking spot" and restore the data from backup. This would allow your 
users to continue working while you buy time to fix the PG.

Best regards,
=================
Frank Schilder
AIT Risø Campus
Bygning 109, rum S14

________________________________________
From: Sagara Wijetunga <[email protected]>
Sent: 03 November 2020 10:39:18
To: [email protected]; Frank Schilder
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Re: How to recover from 
active+clean+inconsistent+failed_repair?

Hi Frank

1. We will disable the disk controller and disk-level caching to avoid future 
issues.

2. My pools are:

ceph osd lspools

    2 cephfs_metadata

    3 cephfs_data

    4 rbd

The PG now inconsistent is 3.b,  therefore, it belongs to cephfs_data pool.

Following also shows the PG 3.b belongs to cephfs_data:

ceph pg ls-by-pool cephfs_data | grep 3.b

3.b     6992        0         0       0  9649392528           0          0 3005 
active+clean+inconsistent   ...


3. Deep scrubs shows only one object having an issue: soid 
3:d577e975:::1000023675e.00000000

This object seems lost.

rados -p cephfs_metadata ls | grep 1000023675e.00000000

rados -p cephfs_data ls | grep 1000023675e.00000000

rados -p rbd ls | grep 1000023675e.00000000


4. I tried to find what are the files effected by this issue, but I get "No 
such file or directory" for the path. I have properly mounted ceph on home as 
before.

cephfs-data-scan -c /etc/ceph/ceph.conf pg_files /home/sagara 3.b
2020-11-03T17:06:21.770+0800 7f3f213ab100 -1 pgeffects.hit_dir: Failed to open 
path: (2) No such file or directory

How do I see what are the files effected by this issue?


5. What should be the course of the action now to bring the cluster to 
"active+clean" to move forward? I don't mind roll back the PG having the issue. 
I have a file-level backup. If roll back the PG is the way forward, how to do?


Thank you.

Best regards

Sagara


On Monday, November 2, 2020, 11:29:55 PM GMT+8, Frank Schilder <[email protected]> 
wrote:


> But there can be a on chip disk controller on the motherboard, I'm not sure.

There is always some kind of controller. Could be on-board. Usually, the cache 
settings are accessible when booting into the BIOS set-up.

> If your worry is fsync persistence

No, what I worry about is volatile write cache, which is usually enabled by 
default. This cache exists on disk as well as on controller. To avoid loosing 
writes on power fail, the controller needs to be in write-through mode and the 
disk write cache disabled. The latter can be done with smartctl, the former in 
the BIOS setup.

Did you test power failure? If so, how often? On how many hosts simultaneously? 
Pulling network cables will not trigger cache related problems. The problem 
with write cache is, that you rely on a lot of bells and whistles where some 
usually fail. With ceph, this will lead to exactly the problem you are 
observing now.

Your pool configuration looks OK. You need to find out where exactly the scrub 
errors are situated. It looks like meta-data damage and you might loose some 
data. Be careful to do only read-only admin operations for now.

Best regards,
=================
Frank Schilder
AIT Risø Campus
Bygning 109, rum S14

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to