Dear All,
RGW provides atomic PUT in order to guarantee write consistency. cf: https://ceph.io/en/news/blog/2011/atomicity-of-restful-radosgw-operations/ But my understanding is that the are no guarantee regarding the PUT order sequence. So basically, if doing a storage class migration: aws s3 cp s3://<bucket-name>/ s3://<bucket-name>/ --recursive --storage-class <storage_class> Then if another client is writing concurrently in this bucket, a PUT collision could happen. Is it correct that in this case the slowest PUT would win? In fact, if the other client starts its PUT after my PUT starts and before my PUT ends, then my PUT would win, overwriting new data with old data... Any ideas to prevent that? Maybe with "radosgw-admin bucket rewrite" ? Maybe by "locking" the object temporary with an ACL or something else? This potential issue could also affect LifeCycle Policies that use StorageClass Transition... Thank you for your help. Cheers Francois -- EveryWare AG François Scheurer Senior Systems Engineer Zurlindenstrasse 52a CH-8003 Zürich tel: +41 44 466 60 00 fax: +41 44 466 60 10 mail: [email protected] web: http://www.everyware.ch
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
