Index pool on Aerospike? Building OSDs on PRAM might be a lot less work than trying to ensure consistency on backing storage while still servicing out of RAM and not syncing every transaction.
> On Jul 18, 2023, at 14:31, Peter Grandi <p...@ceph.list.sabi.co.uk> wrote: > >>>>> [...] S3 workload, that will need to delete 100M file >>>>> daily [...] > >>> [...] average (what about peaks?) around 1,200 committed >>> deletions per second (across the traditional 3 metadata >>> OSDs) sustained, that may not leave a lot of time for file >> creation, writing or reading. :-)[...] > >>>> [...] So many people seem to think that distributed (or >>>> even local) filesystems (and in particular their metadata >>>> servers) can sustain the same workload as high volume >>>> transactional DBMSes. [...] > >> Index pool distributed over a large number of NVMe OSDs? >> Multiple, dedicated RGW instances that only run LC? > > As long as that guarantees a total maximum network+write > latency of well below 800µs across all of them that might > result in a committed rate of a deletion every 800µs (and there > are no peaks and the metadata server only does deletions and > does not do creations or opens or any "maintenance" operations > like checks and backups). :-) > > Sometimes I suggest somewhat seriously entirely RAM based > metadata OSDs, which given a suitable environment may be > feasible. But I still wonder why "So many people seem to think > ... can sustain the same workload as high volume transactional > DBMSes" :-). > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
