On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 6:26 PM David Orman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm hoping to see at least one more, if not more than that, but I have no
> crystal ball. I definitely support this idea, and strongly suggest it's given
> some thought. There have been a lot of delays/missed releases due to all of
> the lab issues, and it's significantly impacted the release cadence for quite
> some time.
Right, we are definitely going to see 16.2.14. Whether it ends up
being the last one will be communicated in the release notes.
Thanks,
Ilya
>
> We've got a fair number of patches we intend for backport to Pacific that
> address core functionality issues impacting our customer workloads, but
> haven't been able to get released due to all of the infrastructure problems.
>
> David
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023, at 05:27, Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> On 17 Jul 2023, at 12:53, Ponnuvel Palaniyappan <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> The typical EOL date (2023-06-01) has already passed for Pacific. Just
> >> wondering if there's going to be another Pacific point release (16.2.14) in
> >> the pipeline.
> >
> > Good point! At least, for possibility upgrade RBD clusters from
> > Nautilus to Pacific, seems this release should get this backport [1]
> >
> > Also, it will be good to see an update of information on distributions
> > (ABC QA grades) [2]
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > [1] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/59538
> > [2] https://docs.ceph.com/en/quincy/start/os-recommendations/#platforms
> >
> > k
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
