Hello Torkil, It would help if you provided the whole "ceph osd df tree" and "ceph pg ls" outputs.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 4:26 PM Torkil Svensgaard <tor...@drcmr.dk> wrote: > > Hi > > We have this after adding some hosts and changing crush failure domain > to datacenter: > > pgs: 1338512379/3162732055 objects misplaced (42.321%) > 5970 active+remapped+backfill_wait > 4853 active+clean > 11 active+remapped+backfilling > > We have 3 datacenters each with 6 hosts and ~400 HDD OSDs with DB/WAL on > NVMe. Using mclock with high_recovery_ops profile. > > What is the bottleneck here? I would have expected a huge number of > simultaneous backfills. Backfill reservation logjam? > > Mvh. > > Torkil > > -- > Torkil Svensgaard > Systems Administrator > Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance DRCMR, Section 714 > Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre > Kettegaard Allé 30, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io -- Alexander E. Patrakov _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
