Hi,
my 2 cents:
Containers are an excellent tool for developers and continuous testing in the development cycle but not a good solution for system tool deployment.
An effort to provide native packages is therefore essential for enterprise ready deployment.
Regards
--martin
Am 15.05.2025 10:22 schrieb Florent Carli <fca...@gmail.com>:
2) Containerization vs. local dependencies
Cephadm’s move to full containerization makes sense in principle,
especially to avoid system-level dependencies. However, in practice,
many operations (e.g., using ceph-bluestore-tool, or the python
modules for Rados/rbd) still seem to require installing packages on
th
Is this the expected model : containers for core daemons, but local
packages for tooling ? It feels somewhat contradictory, and I wonder
if there's a clearer pattern or guidance for those cases.
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
