> > Right.. Looking forward to following that development. > > Just learned how "versions" work for buckets with suspended versioning. At > first, I didn't grasp the difference between "suspended" and "off". TIL.
My understanding is that once enabled, versioning can be suspended but can't be fully unwound to "off" without making a new bucket and copying objects. > As you suggested out of band, I think the solution for me is to prune the old > delete markers using an LC policy. > > Thanks for the help! Glad I could help! You can find examples online. The community makes Ceph awesome. > > tors. 11. dec. 2025, 14.47 skrev Anthony D'Atri <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> I don't recall where it is in the pipeline, but AIUI this has been >> recognized and there has been recent or incipient code work for resharding >> to account for versioned objects (and to reshard without blocking the >> bucket). >> >>> On Dec 11, 2025, at 5:12 AM, Johan Thomsen via ceph-users >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> I looks like "limit check" counts _all_ objects, but the resharder only >>> uses stats from rgw.main. Is that correct? >>> >>> If so, why? Shouldn't the auto-resharding act on the total number of >>> objects in the bucket? >>> >>> I have around 5 million objects in rgw.none and 3 mil in rgw.main... limit >>> check reports 8-9 million objects. >>> >>> (ceph version 19.2.3) >> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
