> I'm tryting to debug low performance on nvme-based cluster. Which specific drives? > I have 24 NVME in 4 servers, plenty of CPU, cluster perfectly balanced, no > scrubbing or replication atm, 1024 pg for 24 OSD/17TB. > > I expect to see some performance (~250k IOPS total, 50% r/w, few hundred > volumes with capped by IOPS, pre-warmed). I see about half of it. > > I looked at drive utilization, it's about 70% (per atop) That's meaningless for SSDs. > but I've noticed, that in-flight for drives is, basically, around 1. That > means, that at a given time only one request is processed. This is match > match for OSD count/3 /latency formula, and with one in-flight nvme is > showing about 10% of it's specs (Intel, DC grade). Have you updated to the latest firmware with SST? > > I looked at osd (they loaded uniformely, so any of them shows the same > results). > > I see "op_wip": 10-27, but in-flight value is about 0-2, mostly around 1. > > I can't get away from the feeling that somehow osd is doing operations > (almost) sequential. I already played with osd_op_num_threads_per_shard (4), > osd_op_num_shards (8), set mclock profile to high_client_ops, > ms_async_op_threads 24, and it can't get more inflight ios. > > I feel I miss something. How to make Ceph to send more requests to > underlaying NVME? > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
[ceph-users] Re: Low number of inflight compare to op_wip
Anthony D'Atri via ceph-users Tue, 16 Dec 2025 05:37:32 -0800
- [ceph-users] Re: Low number of inflight com... Anthony D'Atri via ceph-users
- [ceph-users] Re: Low number of infligh... George Shuklin via ceph-users
- [ceph-users] Re: Low number of infligh... Janne Johansson via ceph-users
- [ceph-users] Re: Low number of infligh... George Shuklin via ceph-users
- [ceph-users] Re: Low number of infligh... Anthony D'Atri via ceph-users
