Thanks Wannes. Those are the caveats around EC optimisation that I
alluded to below. Since we don't have any EC on this cluster that should
not be relevant...
Regards, Chris
On 02/02/2026 09:30, Wannes Smet via ceph-users wrote:
This story jumps to mind:
https://docs.clyso.com/blog/2026/01/13/tentacle-v20.2.0-ec-bug/
________________________________
From: Chris Palmer via ceph-users <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2026 10:16
To: ceph-users <[email protected]>
Subject: [ceph-users] Experiences with Tentacle 20.2.0
I'd like to know whether anyone has any good or bad experiences with Tentacle
20. 2. 0 in a production environment. I have the opportunity to upgrade a small
production cluster from 19. 2. 3 to 20. 2. 0. It uses Cephadm/RBD/CephFS/RGW
with R3 only
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
I'd like to know whether anyone has any good or bad experiences with
Tentacle 20.2.0 in a production environment.
I have the opportunity to upgrade a small production cluster from 19.2.3
to 20.2.0. It uses Cephadm/RBD/CephFS/RGW with R3 only (no EC, so the
known caveats around EC optimisations won't be relevant).
My experiences trying it in a lab test environment have been positive.
But it would be good to know if anyone is encountering any problems with
it in real life.
Thanks, Chris
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
