On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 8:33 AM Brad Hubbard via ceph-users < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2026 at 7:59 AM Yuri Weinstein via ceph-users < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > We are continuing on this release. > > > > > > powercycle - FAILED Brad, approved? > > > > Unfortunately, I don't see any logs anywhere where I have access to them so > I have no way of checking this? > OK, I have the latest logs. The three failing jobs appear to have all timed out after running for about six hours. At this time I don't know why but I continue to investigate. > > > > ceph-volume - Approved Guillaume? > > > > Patrick was reviewing some tests, please see his comments in the same > > tracker. > > TIA > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 13, 2025 at 1:19 AM Ilya Dryomov via ceph-users < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:31 PM Yuri Weinstein via Dev <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > This test branch was built loner then 2.5 weeks ago > > > > I have to rebuild it first and then will schedule krbd > > > > > > krbd approved based on > > > > > > > > > > > > https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2025-12-10_21:26:56-krbd-reef-release-testing-default-smithi/ > > > > > > > > > https://pulpito.ceph.com/yuriw-2025-12-12_18:20:32-krbd-reef-release-testing-default-smithi/ > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Ilya > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 1:39 PM Ilya Dryomov via ceph-users < > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 8:50 PM Ilya Dryomov <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 5:00 PM Venky Shankar via ceph-users > > > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Hi Yuri, > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 4:34 AM Yuri Weinstein < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Note: this is an attempt to test and publish post EOL reef > > point > > > release > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Details of this release are summarized here: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/73906#note-1 > > > >> > > > Release Notes - TBD > > > >> > > > LRC upgrade - N/A > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > distro => jammy focal centos9 windows bookworm > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Seeking approvals/reviews for: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > smoke - Laura approved? > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > rados - Radek, Laura approved? Travis? Nizamudeen? Adam King > > > approved? > > > >> > > > (rados is also running on build 2 == build 1 + > > > >> > > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/66056 per Igor's request) > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > rgw - Adam E approved? > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > fs - Venky approved? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > There are lot many failures in the fs suite resembling > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Error mounting /var/lib/ceph: mount: /var/lib/ceph: > wrong > > fs > > > >> > > type, bad option ... > > > >> > > > > > >> > > which is an issue with the testing kernel. Adding Alex who was > > > looking > > > >> > > into this issue. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > As far as the run validation is concerned, it's risky to ignore > > the > > > >> > > large number of failures. We have two options: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > - fix the testing kernel issue and rerun > > > >> > > - rerun with `for-linus` branch (with `-k for-linus` in the > > > >> > > teuthology-suite schedule command) > > > >> > > > > > >> > > The latter would be using an older kernel branch, but I think it > > > >> > > should suffice for this case. > > > >> > > > > >> > Hi Venky, > > > >> > > > > >> > With your report of the fs suite being affected as well, I carved > > out > > > >> > some time to take a look. > > > >> > > > > >> > I think it's happening because XFS maintainers disabled support > for > > V4 > > > >> > filesystems that was deprecated 5 years ago -- as of 6.18 kernel > > it's > > > >> > no longer compiled in by default. The proper fix would be to > create > > > an > > > >> > image with/move to V5 on-disk format; I have opened [1] to try to > > > >> > achieve that. We can also re-enable V4 on-disk format in our > kernel > > > >> > builds as a workaround. > > > >> > > > > >> > [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph-cm-ansible/pull/799 > > > >> > > > >> This should be fixed now. Yuri, please schedule a rerun for krbd. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> > > > >> Ilya > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > >> ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] > > > >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Dev mailing list -- [email protected] > > > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > _______________________________________________ > > > ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] > > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Brad > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > -- Cheers, Brad _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
