I think it counts overhead "lost" to preallocated space and databases which occur even before a single pool is in place.
Den lör 7 mars 2026 kl 09:28 skrev listy via ceph-users <[email protected]>: > > Hi guys. > > What is 'RAW USE' in _df_ while there is no pool using given > _osd_? > Like so: > > -> $ ceph osd df tree | egrep '(osd\.(3|2|4)\ |ID)' > ID CLASS WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE RAW USE DATA > OMAP META AVAIL %USE VAR PGS STATUS TYPE NAME > 2 MONERO 0.39059 1.00000 400 GiB 660 MiB 14 MiB > 31 KiB 646 MiB 399 GiB 0.16 0.04 0 up > osd.2 > 3 MONERO 0.39059 1.00000 400 GiB 1.5 GiB 15 MiB > 467 KiB 1.4 GiB 399 GiB 0.36 0.08 1 up > osd.3 > 4 MONERO 0.39059 1.00000 400 GiB 567 MiB 15 MiB > 50 KiB 553 MiB 399 GiB 0.14 0.03 1 up > osd.4 > > I have crush rule which is mean to - at least how I get it - > separate osds: cluster is 3x nodes with 150GB + 400GB drives > on each node - in case this matter, separation is suppose to > be between different size drives. > Should _raw use_ & _data_ not be always _zero_? > > many thanks, L. > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
