Hi,
thanks for your quick response.
The reason I'm asking about iSCSI is because I have been able to
deploy and use it in earlier releases (the last one was probably
Pacific), but I'm struggling with deploying NVMe-oF in a virtual lab
cluster. I haven't had the time to really dig into it yet, so there's
definitely a knowledge gap I need to close. Until I made some progress
with NVMe-oF I thought maybe iSCSI could still be used. The use case
is to grant access to an air-gapped Ceph cluster.
Thanks!
Eugen
Zitat von Ernesto Puerta <[email protected]>:
Hey Eugen,
AFAIK the Ceph NVMe-oF Gateway superseded the iSCSI one: it's actively
maintained, more performant, scalable, secure and better integrated with
the Ceph management & observability framework.
I'm curious: what's the target platform/use case for iSCSI that NVMe/TCP
cannot fulfill?
Kind Regards,
Ernesto
On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 8:58 AM Eugen Block via ceph-users <
[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
could someone clarify if using iscsi via cephadm is still supported or
not? According to [0] it's "in maintenance" since November 2022, so no
active development. But it's still documented in all active releases
and can be deployed in Squid or Tentacle (though I haven't checked if
it actually works).
Is it still supported to use iSCSI?
Thanks!
Eugen
[0] https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rbd/iscsi-overview/#ceph-iscsi
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
