Ceph Steering Committee (CSC) Election Report 2026

The CSC 2026 - Q1 election was conducted according to the guidelines set
forth in section two, part six of the CSC Charter (Adopted Feb 12, 2026),
available at
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/main/doc/technical-charter.rst. With
support and input from current CSC members (Joseph Mundackal, Mark Nelson,
Neha Ojha, and Patrick Donnelly), the next CSC election is scheduled for
October 2026.

This election served as the makeup for the missing 2025 election. This
election cycle ran from March 19 through April 29, with results announced
on May 4. The election was administered by Anthony Middleton, Ceph
Community Manager, using ElectionBuddy as the voting platform, following a
recommendation from the Linux Foundation. This report outlines the
structure of the election, participation levels, outcomes, and key
observations from both stages.
Voting Tool

ElectionBuddy

ElectionBuddy was selected to manage the 2026 CSC election. The platform
supported a multi-stage voting process and introduced capabilities that
aligned more closely with CSC governance needs.

Highlights

   -

   Supports ranked-choice voting, enabling more flexible and representative
   outcomes for leadership roles
   -

   Streamlined ballot distribution and tracking, with automated email
   delivery and vote confirmations
   -

   Clear audit trails and real-time result visibility for election
   administrators
   -

   Configurable ballots, allowing multiple question types across different
   election stages

Election Structure

The 2026 CSC election was conducted in two stages.
Stage 1: Nominations and Governance Updates

Stage 1 included two questions:

   1.

   Governance Update (Removal Clause)
   This question proposed updating the CSC member responsibilities to
   include a removal clause. Due to unclear wording, the question caused
   confusion among voters and was ultimately discarded. Following a discussion
   at the March 16th CSC meeting <https://pad.ceph.com/p/csc-weekly-minutes>,
   it was agreed that Anthony Middleton would rewrite the removal section
   for clarity before reintroducing it as a GitHub RP.
   2.

   Co-Chair Nominations
   Voting members were asked to nominate up to three CSC members for the
   Co-Chair ballot. A list of all active CSC members was provided.

Participation

   -

   21 ballots were submitted out of 36 eligible voters (58%)

Outcome and Observations

   -

   Results from the governance question were not counted
   -

   Nomination results were retained and used to form the final ballot
   -

   There was confusion about the structure of the election, with some
   participants believing Stage 1 was the final vote
   -

   Several members did not receive ballots due to outdated contact
   information on the CSC Governance page
   -

   Voting was reopened for an additional three days to account for missed
   participation

Following Stage 1, outreach was conducted to all individuals nominated. Of
the 11 members nominated, 6 accepted placement on the final ballot.

A new addition to this election cycle was the introduction of candidate
statements. Each candidate was given up to two minutes during a CSC meeting
to speak about their candidacy. This was the first time this format was
used and was received positively by CSC members.

Election Data
ElectionBuddy Repost of Stage 1
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1E1H9GAO9PNGZ-Sl_bOb7PCzEaXhTKPDqZpyL6NaQsTQ/edit?usp=sharing>
Stage 2: Co-Chair Election and Governance Votes

Stage 2 ran for two weeks and included:

   -

   Two governance questions related to CSC membership removal
   -

   One ranked-choice vote to elect CSC Co-Chairs

Participation

   -

   27 ballots submitted out of 36 eligible voters (75%)
   -

   1 spoiled ballot recorded

Election Data

   -

   ElectionBuddyReport - Results
   
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q3_jtNfrYcjg77_DGKEYY7-mxXwXTSKvlio8IOUMjBw/edit?usp=sharing>
   -

   ElectionBuddyReport -VoteByVote
   
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1YSw7fSxSO6ucJq58MZAEXhqA7pQE7qJdibYbUH5gvqk/edit?usp=sharing>
   -

   ElectionBuddyReport - VoterStatus (voter participation by email)
   
<https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rg0LsAnNgBmIzJtkgSDY7aSA1R0mCSqsMfoyxl8e6mo/edit?usp=sharing>

Votes for removal of two members

CSC members determined that these members were seen as inactive.

   -

   Ken Dreyer Removal Vote
   -

      27 votes in favor
      -

      0 abstentions
      -

   Jeff Layton Removal Vote
   -

      25 votes in favor
      -

      2 abstentions

Co-Chair Election Results

A ranked voting system was used to elect up to three Co-Chairs. A
governance constraint was applied to ensure that no more than two Co-Chairs
could come from the same organization.

Vote Distribution

   -

   Patrick Donnelly — 20 votes (27.40%)
   -

   Neha Ojha — 16 votes (21.92%)
   -

   Dan van der Ster — 14 votes (19.18%)
   -

   Joseph Mundackal — 11 votes (15.07%)
   -

   Ernesto Puerta — 6 votes (8.22%)
   -

   Gregory Farnum — 6 votes (8.22%)

Outcome
The top three vote-getters were selected as CSC Co-Chairs, subject to the
rule on organizational representation.
Observations

Stage 2 showed clear improvement over Stage 1:

   -

   Ballot structure and questions were better understood
   -

   No significant confusion was reported during voting
   -

   Participation increased from 58% to 75%

However, some challenges remained:

   -

   A portion of eligible voters did not participate despite multiple
   follow-ups via email and Slack
   -

   Delayed responses from non-participating members slowed the overall
   process

Summary

The 2026 CSC election introduced several meaningful improvements, including
ranked-choice voting and candidate statements, both of which contributed to
a more transparent and participatory process. While Stage 1 revealed gaps
in communication and ballot clarity, those issues were addressed in Stage
2, resulting in stronger engagement and cleaner execution.

Future election cycles would benefit from clearer ballot language upfront,
enforced updates to voter contact information, and continued use of
candidate advocacy opportunities.

Best,
-------
Anthony Middleton
Community Manager, Ceph Foundation

[email protected]
LinkedIn  <https://www.linkedin.com/company/ceph>| BlueSky
<https://bsky.app/profile/ceph.io> | Twitter <https://x.com/Ceph>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to