Because some users won't trust tools that have limited or no human
oversight.
Having a repository that is written by "AI" with one single large commit
calls into question
* the maintainability of the code
* the understanding of the author of the code
* the longevity of the project
* the safety
If the software was read only it _could_ be ok, but I would never give a
vibe coded piece of software that I didn't read completely access to my
cluster.
If a human maintains a piece of software I can look at the commit
history, understand the design, be reasonable sure to follow the code
and could in theory follow the development. LLM code-dumps that span
thousands of lines and aren't even completely shown in the github diff
view are a nightmare.
Oh and I find it intransparent and questionable if someone isn't open
about using AI. If a project is transparent about it's usage I'm more
willing to give them the benefit of the doubt as if they don't mention
it at all.
Kind regards,
Thomas
On 2026-07-13 16:43, Anthony D'Atri wrote:
Why does that matter?
On Jul 13, 2026, at 10:41 AM, Thomas Schneider via ceph-users
<[email protected]> wrote:
Looking at the README and "commit history" this kind of screams vibe
coded which turns me off from even trying to use it tbh. If you used
LLMs you should be transparent about it.
--
Thomas Schneider
IT.SERVICES
Wissenschaftliche Informationsversorgung
Ruhr-Universität Bochum | 44780 Bochum
Telefon: +49 234 32 23939
http://www.it-services.rub.de/
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
