Note that I still have scrub errors, but rados doesn't see thoses objects :
root! brontes:~# rados -p hdd3copies ls | grep '^rb.0.15c26.238e1f29' root! brontes:~# Le vendredi 31 mai 2013 à 15:36 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet a écrit : > Hi, > > sorry for the late answer : trying to fix that, I tried to delete the > image (rbd rm XXX), the "rbd rm" complete without errors, but "rbd ls" > still display this image. > > What should I do ? > > > Here the files for the PG 3.6b : > > # find /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-28/current/3.6b_head/ -name > 'rb.0.15c26.238e1f29*' -print0 | xargs -r -0 ls -l > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4194304 19 mai 22:52 > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-28/current/3.6b_head/DIR_B/DIR_6/DIR_1/DIR_C/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.000000009221__12d7_ADE3C16B__3 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4194304 19 mai 23:00 > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-28/current/3.6b_head/DIR_B/DIR_E/DIR_0/DIR_C/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.000000003671__12d7_261CC0EB__3 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4194304 19 mai 22:59 > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-28/current/3.6b_head/DIR_B/DIR_E/DIR_A/DIR_E/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.0000000086a2__12d7_B10DEAEB__3 > > # find /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-23/current/3.6b_head/ -name > 'rb.0.15c26.238e1f29*' -print0 | xargs -r -0 ls -l > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4194304 25 mars 19:18 > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-23/current/3.6b_head/DIR_B/DIR_6/DIR_1/DIR_C/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.000000009221__12d7_ADE3C16B__3 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4194304 25 mars 19:33 > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-23/current/3.6b_head/DIR_B/DIR_E/DIR_0/DIR_C/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.000000003671__12d7_261CC0EB__3 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4194304 25 mars 19:34 > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-23/current/3.6b_head/DIR_B/DIR_E/DIR_A/DIR_E/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.0000000086a2__12d7_B10DEAEB__3 > > # find /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-5/current/3.6b_head/ -name > 'rb.0.15c26.238e1f29*' -print0 | xargs -r -0 ls -l > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4194304 25 mars 19:18 > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-5/current/3.6b_head/DIR_B/DIR_6/DIR_1/DIR_C/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.000000009221__12d7_ADE3C16B__3 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4194304 25 mars 19:33 > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-5/current/3.6b_head/DIR_B/DIR_E/DIR_0/DIR_C/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.000000003671__12d7_261CC0EB__3 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4194304 25 mars 19:34 > /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-5/current/3.6b_head/DIR_B/DIR_E/DIR_A/DIR_E/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.0000000086a2__12d7_B10DEAEB__3 > > > As you can see, OSD doesn't contain any other data on thoses PG for this RBD > image. Should I remove them thought rados ? > > > In fact I remember that some of thoses files was truncated (size 0), then I > manually copy data from osd-5. It was probably an error to do that. > > > Thanks, > Olivier > > Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 à 15:53 -0700, Samuel Just a écrit : > > Can you send the filenames in the pg directories for those 4 pgs? > > -Sam > > > > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Olivier Bonvalet <ceph.l...@daevel.fr> > > wrote: > > > No : > > > pg 3.7c is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [24,13,39] > > > pg 3.6b is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [28,23,5] > > > pg 3.d is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [29,4,11] > > > pg 3.1 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting [28,19,5] > > > > > > But I suppose that all PG *was* having the osd.25 as primary (on the > > > same host), which is (disabled) buggy OSD. > > > > > > Question : "12d7" in object path is the snapshot id, right ? If it's the > > > case, I haven't got any snapshot with this id for the > > > rb.0.15c26.238e1f29 image. > > > > > > So, which files should I remove ? > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > Le jeudi 23 mai 2013 à 15:17 -0700, Samuel Just a écrit : > > >> Do all of the affected PGs share osd.28 as the primary? I think the > > >> only recovery is probably to manually remove the orphaned clones. > > >> -Sam > > >> > > >> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Olivier Bonvalet <ceph.l...@daevel.fr> > > >> wrote: > > >> > Not yet. I keep it for now. > > >> > > > >> > Le mercredi 22 mai 2013 à 15:50 -0700, Samuel Just a écrit : > > >> >> rb.0.15c26.238e1f29 > > >> >> > > >> >> Has that rbd volume been removed? > > >> >> -Sam > > >> >> > > >> >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Olivier Bonvalet > > >> >> <ceph.l...@daevel.fr> wrote: > > >> >> > 0.61-11-g3b94f03 (0.61-1.1), but the bug occured with bobtail. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Le mercredi 22 mai 2013 à 12:00 -0700, Samuel Just a écrit : > > >> >> >> What version are you running? > > >> >> >> -Sam > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Olivier Bonvalet > > >> >> >> <ceph.l...@daevel.fr> wrote: > > >> >> >> > Is it enough ? > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > # tail -n500 -f /var/log/ceph/osd.28.log | grep -A5 -B5 'found > > >> >> >> > clone without head' > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 15:43:09.308352 7f707dd64700 0 log [INF] : 9.105 > > >> >> >> > scrub ok > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 15:44:21.054893 7f707dd64700 0 log [INF] : 9.451 > > >> >> >> > scrub ok > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 15:44:52.898784 7f707cd62700 0 log [INF] : 9.784 > > >> >> >> > scrub ok > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 15:47:43.148515 7f707cd62700 0 log [INF] : 9.3c3 > > >> >> >> > scrub ok > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 15:47:45.717085 7f707dd64700 0 log [INF] : 9.3d0 > > >> >> >> > scrub ok > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 15:52:14.573815 7f707dd64700 0 log [ERR] : scrub > > >> >> >> > 3.6b ade3c16b/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.000000009221/12d7//3 found > > >> >> >> > clone without head > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 15:55:07.230114 7f707d563700 0 log [ERR] : scrub > > >> >> >> > 3.6b 261cc0eb/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.000000003671/12d7//3 found > > >> >> >> > clone without head > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 15:56:56.456242 7f707d563700 0 log [ERR] : scrub > > >> >> >> > 3.6b b10deaeb/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.0000000086a2/12d7//3 found > > >> >> >> > clone without head > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 15:57:51.667085 7f707dd64700 0 log [ERR] : 3.6b > > >> >> >> > scrub 3 errors > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 15:57:55.241224 7f707dd64700 0 log [INF] : 9.450 > > >> >> >> > scrub ok > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 15:57:59.800383 7f707cd62700 0 log [INF] : 9.465 > > >> >> >> > scrub ok > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 15:59:55.024065 7f707661a700 0 -- > > >> >> >> > 192.168.42.3:6803/12142 >> 192.168.42.5:6828/31490 > > >> >> >> > pipe(0x2a689000 sd=108 :6803 s=2 pgs=200652 cs=73 l=0).fault > > >> >> >> > with nothing to send, going to standby > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:01:45.542579 7f7022770700 0 -- > > >> >> >> > 192.168.42.3:6803/12142 >> 192.168.42.5:6828/31490 > > >> >> >> > pipe(0x2a689280 sd=99 :6803 s=0 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).accept > > >> >> >> > connect_seq 74 vs existing 73 state standby > > >> >> >> > -- > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:29:49.544310 7f707dd64700 0 log [INF] : 9.4eb > > >> >> >> > scrub ok > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:29:53.190233 7f707dd64700 0 log [INF] : 9.4f4 > > >> >> >> > scrub ok > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:29:59.478736 7f707dd64700 0 log [INF] : 8.6bb > > >> >> >> > scrub ok > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:35:12.240246 7f7022770700 0 -- > > >> >> >> > 192.168.42.3:6803/12142 >> 192.168.42.5:6828/31490 > > >> >> >> > pipe(0x2a689280 sd=99 :6803 s=2 pgs=200667 cs=75 l=0).fault with > > >> >> >> > nothing to send, going to standby > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:35:19.519019 7f707d563700 0 log [INF] : 8.700 > > >> >> >> > scrub ok > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:39:15.422532 7f707dd64700 0 log [ERR] : scrub 3.1 > > >> >> >> > b1869301/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.000000000836/12d7//3 found clone > > >> >> >> > without head > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:40:04.995256 7f707cd62700 0 log [ERR] : scrub 3.1 > > >> >> >> > bccad701/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.000000009a00/12d7//3 found clone > > >> >> >> > without head > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:41:07.008717 7f707d563700 0 log [ERR] : scrub 3.1 > > >> >> >> > 8a9bec01/rb.0.15c26.238e1f29.000000009820/12d7//3 found clone > > >> >> >> > without head > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:41:42.460280 7f707c561700 0 log [ERR] : 3.1 scrub > > >> >> >> > 3 errors > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:46:12.385678 7f7077735700 0 -- > > >> >> >> > 192.168.42.3:6803/12142 >> 192.168.42.5:6828/31490 > > >> >> >> > pipe(0x2a689c80 sd=137 :6803 s=0 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).accept > > >> >> >> > connect_seq 76 vs existing 75 state standby > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:58:36.079010 7f707661a700 0 -- > > >> >> >> > 192.168.42.3:6803/12142 >> 192.168.42.3:6801/11745 > > >> >> >> > pipe(0x2a689a00 sd=44 :6803 s=0 pgs=0 cs=0 l=0).accept > > >> >> >> > connect_seq 40 vs existing 39 state standby > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:58:36.798038 7f707d563700 0 log [INF] : 9.50c > > >> >> >> > scrub ok > > >> >> >> > 2013-05-22 16:58:40.104159 7f707c561700 0 log [INF] : 9.526 > > >> >> >> > scrub ok > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > Note : I have 8 scrub errors like that, on 4 impacted PG, and > > >> >> >> > all impacted objects are about the same RBD image > > >> >> >> > (rb.0.15c26.238e1f29). > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > Le mercredi 22 mai 2013 à 11:01 -0700, Samuel Just a écrit : > > >> >> >> >> Can you post your ceph.log with the period including all of > > >> >> >> >> these errors? > > >> >> >> >> -Sam > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Dzianis Kahanovich > > >> >> >> >> <maha...@bspu.unibel.by> wrote: > > >> >> >> >> > Olivier Bonvalet пишет: > > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> Le lundi 20 mai 2013 à 00:06 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet a écrit > > >> >> >> >> >> : > > >> >> >> >> >>> Le mardi 07 mai 2013 à 15:51 +0300, Dzianis Kahanovich a > > >> >> >> >> >>> écrit : > > >> >> >> >> >>>> I have 4 scrub errors (3 PGs - "found clone without > > >> >> >> >> >>>> head"), on one OSD. Not > > >> >> >> >> >>>> repairing. How to repair it exclude re-creating of OSD? > > >> >> >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >> >> >>>> Now it "easy" to clean+create OSD, but in theory - in case > > >> >> >> >> >>>> there are multiple > > >> >> >> >> >>>> OSDs - it may cause data lost. > > >> >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> >> >> >>> I have same problem : 8 objects (4 PG) with error "found > > >> >> >> >> >>> clone without > > >> >> >> >> >>> head". How can I fix that ? > > >> >> >> >> >> since "pg repair" doesn't handle that kind of errors, is > > >> >> >> >> >> there a way to > > >> >> >> >> >> manually fix that ? (it's a production cluster) > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > Trying to fix manually I cause assertions in trimming process > > >> >> >> >> > (died OSD). And > > >> >> >> >> > many others troubles. So, if you want to keep cluster > > >> >> >> >> > running, wait for > > >> >> >> >> > developers answer. IMHO. > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > About manual repair attempt: see issue #4937. Also similar > > >> >> >> >> > results - in subject > > >> >> >> >> > "Inconsistent PG's, repair ineffective". > > >> >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> >> > -- > > >> >> >> >> > WBR, Dzianis Kahanovich AKA Denis Kaganovich, > > >> >> >> >> > http://mahatma.bspu.unibel.by/ > > >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > > >> >> >> >> > ceph-users mailing list > > >> >> >> >> > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > > >> >> >> >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> -- > > >> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > > >> >> >> ceph-devel" in > > >> >> >> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > > >> >> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> -- > > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > > >> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
