Hi,

we are currently using the patched fastcgi version 
(2.4.7-0910042141-6-gd4fffda) Updating to a more recent version is currently 
blocked by http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/6453

Is there a documentation for running radosgw with nginx? I only find some 
mailinglist posts with some config snippets. 

Sebastian

On 30.11.2013, at 20:46, Andrew Woodward wrote:

> Are you using the  inktank patched FastCGI sever? http://gitbuilder.ceph.com
> 
> Alternately try another script sever like ngnix as already suggested.
> 
> On Nov 29, 2013 12:23 PM, "German Anders" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot Sebastian, i'm going to try that, also i'm having an issue while 
> trying to test a rbd creation, i've install in the deploy server the 
> ceph-client:
> 
> ceph@ceph-deploy01:/etc/ceph$ sudo rbd -n client.ceph-test -k 
> /home/ceph/ceph-cluster/ceph.client.admin.keyring create --size 10240 cephdata
> 2013-11-29 15:20:25.683930 7fcd9979c780  0 librados: client.ceph-openstack 
> authentication error (1) Operation not permitted
> rbd: couldn't connect to the cluster!
> 
>  Anyone know what could be the issue here? maybe it has something to do with 
> keys or maybe not...
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> Best regards,
>  
> German Anders
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>> --- Original message --- 
>> Asunto: Re: [ceph-users] radosgw daemon stalls on download of some files 
>> De: Sebastian <[email protected]> 
>> Para: ceph-users <[email protected]> 
>> Fecha: Friday, 29/11/2013 16:18
>> 
>> Hi Yehuda,
>> 
>> 
>>> It's interesting, the responses are received but seems that they
>>> aren't being handled (hence the following pings). There are a few
>>> things that you could look at. First, try to connect to the admin
>>> socket and see if you get any useful information from there. This
>>> could include in-flight requests, look for other requests that have
>>> not completed. Also see if there's indication for requests throttling.
>> 
>> Do you refer to the methods mentioned here? 
>> http://ceph.com/docs/dumpling/radosgw/troubleshooting/?
>> Unfortunately the socket file is not present. Do i have to activate it in 
>> the config somehow? I could not find any reference to that in the docs. Is 
>> it already included in my radosgw version?
>> radosgw -v
>> ceph version 0.67.4 (ad85b8bfafea6232d64cb7ba76a8b6e8252fa0c7)
>> 
>>> Another thing to look at would be at the seemingly unrelated timeout
>>> messages. These should not happen and might indicate that there's
>>> something that is holding you up that shouldn't. Try searching for the
>>> same thread id that is specified in these messages (omit the 0x
>>> prefix), and see what's the last thing that it's doing.
>> 
>> I checked that: 
>> http://pastebin.com/Z23PWwjt
>> i do not see anything unusual before the messages happen, but maybe you see 
>> something odd. 
>> 
>> 
>>> You could also try turning on also 'debug objecter = 20', see if it
>>> provides more info (it's very verbose though).
>>> 
>> 
>> Did that, but that is way to verbose for me ;) I uploaded it here:
>> http://pastebin.com/VBPAVP6z
>> There might be some requests mixed into it, but the one for 
>> cdn/52974400c6dd6ca719000004/source.avi is the one that stalled. 
>> 
>>> How much are you loading the gateway before that happens? We've seen a
>>> similar issue in the past that was related to the fcgi library that is
>>> dynamically linked with the radosgw process (that is, not the apache
>>> mod_fastcgi module). This, however, would only happen when there's
>>> heavy load and the fd numbers handled by the radosgw surpassed 1024
>>> (buggy library that was using select() instead of poll()).
>> 
>> There are not that many requests on the Storage, maybe 10-20 req/min. The 
>> cluster serves as a source for a CDN, so once the resource is fetched it 
>> should not be fetched again soon. I checked for the open files, and there 
>> are only about 10-20 open file handles for the radosgw process. So this 
>> probably is not the issue. 
>> 
>> Sebastian
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Yehuda
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Sebastian <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> thanks for the hint. I tried this again and noticed that the time out 
>>>> message does seem to be unrelated. Here is the log file for a stalling 
>>>> request with debug turned on:
>>>> http://pastebin.com/DcQuc9wP
>>>> 
>>>> I really cannot really find a real "error" in the log. The download stalls 
>>>> at about 500kb at that point though. Restarting radosgw fixes it for 1 
>>>> download only, the next one is broken again. But as i said this does not 
>>>> happen for all files.
>>>> 
>>>> Sebastian
>>>> 
>>>> On 27.11.2013, at 21:53, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Sebastian <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> we have a setup of 4 Servers running ceph and radosgw. We use it as an 
>>>>>> internal S3 service for our files. The Servers run Debian Squeeze with 
>>>>>> Ceph 0.67.4.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The cluster has been running smoothly for quite a while, but we are 
>>>>>> currently experiencing issues with the radosgw. For some files the HTTP 
>>>>>> Download just stalls at around 500kb.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The Apache error log just says:
>>>>>> [error] [client ] FastCGI: comm with server "/var/www/s3gw.fcgi" 
>>>>>> aborted: idle timeout (30 sec)
>>>>>> [error] [client ] Handler for fastcgi-script returned invalid result 
>>>>>> code 1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> radosgw logging:
>>>>>> 7f00bc66a700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy 'RGWProcess::m_tp thread 
>>>>>> 0x7f00934bb700' had timed out after 600
>>>>>> 7f00bc66a700 1 heartbeat_map is_healthy 'RGWProcess::m_tp thread 
>>>>>> 0x7f00ab4eb700' had timed out after 600
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The interesting thing is that the cluster health is fine an only some 
>>>>>> files are not working properly. Most of them just work fine. A restart 
>>>>>> of radosgw fixes the issue. The other ceph logs are also clean.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Any idea why this happens?
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> No, but you can turn on 'debug ms = 1' on your gateway ceph.conf, and
>>>>> that might give some better indication.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yehuda
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to