Got it. Thanks Greg for the response!

Thanks,
Guang

On Feb 26, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Gregory Farnum <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Guang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Most recently when looking at PG's folder splitting, I found that there was
>> only one sub folder in the top 3 / 4 levels and start having 16 sub folders
>> starting from level 6, what is the design consideration behind this?
>> 
>> For example, if the PG root folder is '3.1905_head', in the first level, it
>> only has one sub folder 'DIR_5' and then one sub folder 'DIR_0', and then
>> 'DIR_9', under which there are two sub folders 'DIR_1' and 'DIR_9', starting
>> from which, the next level has 16 sub folders.
>> 
>> If we start splitting into 16 sub folders in the very first level, we may
>> potential gain better performance with less dentry lookup (though most
>> likely the root level been cached).
> 
> It's an implementation detail of the FileStore (the part of the OSD
> that stores data in the filesystem). Each of those folders represents
> an ever-smaller division of the hash space that objects live in. The
> more PGs you have, the less hash space each one covers, so there's
> that trail of folders.
> It's a bit unfortunate, because as you mention it involves more
> metadata memory caching, but fixing it would require some fairly
> detailed code in a critical path. The cost of fixing it and the risk
> of breaking things haven't been worth it yet.
> -Greg
> Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to