On 13 Mar 2014 at 11:23:44, Gandalf Corvotempesta 
([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) wrote:
2014-03-13 11:19 GMT+01:00 Dan Van Der Ster <[email protected]>:
> Do you mean you used PG splitting?
>
> You should split PGs by a factor of 2x at a time. So to get from 64 to 8192,
> do 64->128, then 128->256, ..., 4096->8192.

I've brutally increased, no further steps.

64 -> 8192 :-)

See http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/6922

This is explicity blocked in latest code (not sure if thats released yet).

— Dan
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to