Hey,
Just examing what happened to an OSD, that was just turned off. Data has
been moved away from it, so hesitating to turned it back on.
Got the below in the logs, any clues to what the assert talks about?
Cheers,
Josef
-1 os/FileStore.cc: In function 'virtual int FileStore::read(coll_t,
const hobject_t&, uint64_t, size_t, ceph::bufferlist&, bool)' thread
7fdacb88
c700 time 2014-06-11 21:13:54.036982
os/FileStore.cc: 2992: FAILED assert(allow_eio || !m_filestore_fail_eio
|| got != -5)
ceph version 0.67.7 (d7ab4244396b57aac8b7e80812115bbd079e6b73)
1: (FileStore::read(coll_t, hobject_t const&, unsigned long, unsigned
long, ceph::buffer::list&, bool)+0x653) [0x8ab6c3]
2: (ReplicatedPG::do_osd_ops(ReplicatedPG::OpContext*,
std::vector<OSDOp, std::allocator<OSDOp> >&)+0x350) [0x708230]
3: (ReplicatedPG::prepare_transaction(ReplicatedPG::OpContext*)+0x86)
[0x713366]
4: (ReplicatedPG::do_op(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>)+0x3095)
[0x71acb5]
5: (PG::do_request(std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>,
ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x3f0) [0x812340]
6: (OSD::dequeue_op(boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>,
std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest>, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x2ea) [0x75c80a]
7: (OSD::OpWQ::_process(boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>,
ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x198) [0x770da8]
8: (ThreadPool::WorkQueueVal<std::pair<boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>,
std::tr1::shared_ptr<OpRequest> >, boost::intrusive_ptr<PG>
>::_void_process(void*, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0xae) [0x7a89
ce]
9: (ThreadPool::worker(ThreadPool::WorkThread*)+0x68a) [0x9b5dea]
10: (ThreadPool::WorkThread::entry()+0x10) [0x9b7040]
11: (()+0x6b50) [0x7fdadffdfb50]
12: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7fdade53b0ed]
NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is
needed to interpret this.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
