Hi Joao,
In the meanwhile I have done the following things :
$ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd15 rack=rack1-pdu1
moved item id -17 name 'ceph-osd15' to location {rack=rack1-pdu1} in crush map
$ ceph osd crush rm rack2-pdu3
removed item id -23 name 'rack2-pdu3' from crush map
But it does not solve the problem either.
I saw in the documentation that restarting the osd where the PG are stuck
could help... I did restart all the OSD but it leads to the following status :
cluster 4a8669b9-b379-43b2-9488-7fca6e1366bc
health HEALTH_WARN 80 pgs degraded; 152 pgs peering; 411 pgs stale; 166
pgs stuck inactive; 411 pgs stuck stale; 620 pgs stuck unclean; recovery
51106/694410 objects degraded (7.360%)
monmap e2: 3 mons at
{ceph-mon0=10.1.2.1:6789/0,ceph-mon1=10.1.2.2:6789/0,ceph-mon2=10.1.2.3:6789/0},
election epoch 68, quorum 0,1,2 ceph-mon0,ceph-mon1,ceph-mon2
osdmap e1825: 16 osds: 16 up, 16 in
pgmap v301798: 712 pgs, 5 pools, 1350 GB data, 338 kobjects
2763 GB used, 5615 GB / 8379 GB avail
51106/694410 objects degraded (7.360%)
152 stale+peering
73 stale+active+remapped
80 stale+active+degraded+remapped
92 stale+active+clean
301 active+remapped
14 stale
You'll find my crush map here :
http://pastebin.com/F9aFjcjm
Cheers,
Olivier.
----- Mail original -----
> De: "Joao Eduardo Luis" <[email protected]>
> À: "Olivier DELHOMME" <[email protected]>,
> [email protected]
> Envoyé: Mercredi 23 Juillet 2014 19:39:52
> Objet: Re: [ceph-users] MON segfaulting when setting a crush ruleset to a
> pool (firefly 0.80.4)
>
> Hey Olivier,
>
> On 07/23/2014 02:06 PM, Olivier DELHOMME wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm running a test cluster (mon and osd are debian 7
> > with 3.2.57-3+deb7u2 kernel). The client is a debian 7
> > with a 3.15.4 kernel that I compiled myself.
> >
> > The cluster has 3 monitors and 16 osd servers.
> > I created a pool (periph) and used it a bit and then
> > I decided to create some buckets and moved the hosts
> > into :
>
> Can you share your crush map?
>
> Cheers!
>
> -Joao
>
>
> >
> > $ ceph osd crush add-bucket rack1-pdu1 rack
> > $ ceph osd crush add-bucket rack1-pdu2 rack
> > $ ceph osd crush add-bucket rack1-pdu3 rack
> > $ ceph osd crush add-bucket rack2-pdu1 rack
> > $ ceph osd crush add-bucket rack2-pdu2 rack
> > $ ceph osd crush add-bucket rack2-pdu3 rack
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd0 rack=rack1-pdu1
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd1 rack=rack1-pdu1
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd2 rack=rack1-pdu1
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd3 rack=rack1-pdu2
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd4 rack=rack1-pdu2
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd5 rack=rack1-pdu2
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd6 rack=rack1-pdu3
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd7 rack=rack1-pdu3
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd8 rack=rack1-pdu3
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd9 rack=rack2-pdu1
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd10 rack=rack2-pdu1
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd11 rack=rack2-pdu1
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd12 rack=rack2-pdu2
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd13 rack=rack2-pdu2
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd14 rack=rack2-pdu2
> > $ ceph osd crush move ceph-osd15 rack=rack2-pdu3
> >
> > It did well :
> >
> > $ ceph osd tree
> > # id weight type name up/down reweight
> > -23 0.91 rack rack2-pdu3
> > -17 0.91 host ceph-osd15
> > 15 0.91 osd.15 up 1
> > -22 1.81 rack rack2-pdu2
> > -14 0.45 host ceph-osd12
> > 12 0.45 osd.12 up 1
> > -15 0.45 host ceph-osd13
> > 13 0.45 osd.13 up 1
> > -16 0.91 host ceph-osd14
> > 14 0.91 osd.14 up 1
> > -21 1.35 rack rack2-pdu1
> > -11 0.45 host ceph-osd9
> > 9 0.45 osd.9 up 1
> > -12 0.45 host ceph-osd10
> > 10 0.45 osd.10 up 1
> > -13 0.45 host ceph-osd11
> > 11 0.45 osd.11 up 1
> > -20 1.35 rack rack1-pdu3
> > -8 0.45 host ceph-osd6
> > 6 0.45 osd.6 up 1
> > -9 0.45 host ceph-osd7
> > 7 0.45 osd.7 up 1
> > -10 0.45 host ceph-osd8
> > 8 0.45 osd.8 up 1
> > -19 1.35 rack rack1-pdu2
> > -5 0.45 host ceph-osd3
> > 3 0.45 osd.3 up 1
> > -6 0.45 host ceph-osd4
> > 4 0.45 osd.4 up 1
> > -7 0.45 host ceph-osd5
> > 5 0.45 osd.5 up 1
> > -18 1.35 rack rack1-pdu1
> > -2 0.45 host ceph-osd0
> > 0 0.45 osd.0 up 1
> > -3 0.45 host ceph-osd1
> > 1 0.45 osd.1 up 1
> > -4 0.45 host ceph-osd2
> > 2 0.45 osd.2 up 1
> > -1 0 root default
> >
> >
> > But then, when trying to set the crush_ruleset to the
> > pool with the command below it crashes two of the three
> > monitor.
> >
> >
> > $ ceph osd pool set periph crush_ruleset 2
> > 2014-07-23 14:43:38.942811 7fa9696a3700 0 monclient: hunting for new mon
> >
> > The first monitor come to :
> >
> > -4> 2014-07-23 14:43:37.476121 7f52d2f46700 1 -- 10.1.2.1:6789/0 -->
> > 10.1.2.100:0/1027991 -- mon_command_ack([{"prefix":
> > "get_command_descriptions"}]=0 v0) v1 -- ?+29681 0x3b1c780 con
> > 0x2a578c0
> > -3> 2014-07-23 14:43:37.598549 7f52d2f46700 1 -- 10.1.2.1:6789/0 <==
> > client.39105 10.1.2.100:0/1027991 8 ==== mon_command({"var":
> > "crush_ruleset", "prefix": "osd pool set", "pool": "periph", "val":
> > "2"} v 0) v1 ==== 122+0+0 (2844980124 0 0) 0x3b1d860 con 0x2a578c0
> > -2> 2014-07-23 14:43:37.598602 7f52d2f46700 0 mon.ceph-mon0@0(leader)
> > e2 handle_command mon_command({"var": "crush_ruleset", "prefix": "osd
> > pool set", "pool": "periph", "val": "2"} v 0) v1
> > -1> 2014-07-23 14:43:37.598705 7f52d2f46700 1
> > mon.ceph-mon0@0(leader).paxos(paxos active c 542663..543338)
> > is_readable now=2014-07-23 14:43:37.598708 lease_expire=2014-07-23
> > 14:43:41.683421 has v0 lc 543338
> > 0> 2014-07-23 14:43:37.601706 7f52d2f46700 -1 *** Caught signal
> > (Segmentation fault) **
> > in thread 7f52d2f46700
> >
> >
> > Then, after an election try the second monitor goes down also :
> >
> > -1> 2014-07-23 14:43:51.772370 7eff4ba15700 1
> > mon.ceph-mon1@1(leader).paxos(paxos active c 542663..543338)
> > is_readable now=2014-07-23 14:43:51.772373 lease_expire=2014-07-23
> > 14:43:56.770906 has v0 lc 543338
> > 0> 2014-07-23 14:43:51.775817 7eff4ba15700 -1 *** Caught signal
> > (Segmentation fault) **
> >
> > I can not reactivate the monitors until the command
> > "ceph osd pool set periph crush_ruleset 2" is running.
> >
> > When I kill this command, then the monitors can run
> > again and retrieve a normal state but it leaves the
> > cluster with some warnings about data replacements
> > not achieved I guess (I had some data in the pool).
> >
> > cluster 4a8669b9-b379-43b2-9488-7fca6e1366bc
> > health HEALTH_WARN 152 pgs peering; 166 pgs stuck inactive; 620 pgs
> > stuck unclean; recovery 620/694410 objects degraded (0.089%)
> > monmap e2: 3 mons at
> >
> > {ceph-mon0=10.1.2.1:6789/0,ceph-mon1=10.1.2.2:6789/0,ceph-mon2=10.1.2.3:6789/0},
> > election epoch 50, quorum 0,1,2 ceph-mon0,ceph-mon1,ceph-mon2
> > osdmap e1688: 16 osds: 16 up, 16 in
> > pgmap v300875: 712 pgs, 5 pools, 1350 GB data, 338 kobjects
> > 2765 GB used, 5614 GB / 8379 GB avail
> > 620/694410 objects degraded (0.089%)
> > 14 inactive
> > 152 peering
> > 454 active+remapped
> > 92 active+clean
> >
> > Is there something that I did wrong or forgot to do ?
> >
> > While writing this mail down I realised that there is
> > only one host in the rack2-pdu3 rack. May this be a
> > cause of the problem ?
> >
> > Thanks for any hints.
> >
>
>
> --
> Joao Eduardo Luis
> Software Engineer | http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
