I??tested osd with btrfs, looks like the write performance is a little bit
faste than xfs, but there are a lot of painful problem like:
1. restart osd take about 1 - 2 hours
2. osd will down everday
3. etc.
------------------ ???????? ------------------
??????: "Andrew Thrift";<[email protected]>;
????????: 2014??9??5??(??????) ????11:26
??????: "Andrei Mikhailovsky"<[email protected]>;
????: "ceph-users"<[email protected]>;
????: Re: [ceph-users] Cache pool and using btrfs for ssd osds
I have recently been wondering the same thing.
Does anyone have any experience with this ?
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:18 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky <[email protected]> wrote:
Hello guys,
I was wondering if there is a benefit of using journal-less btrfs file system
on the cache pool osds? Would it speed up the writes to the cache tier? Is
btrfs and ceph getting close to production level?
Cheers
Andrei
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
