Yes, I understand that.
The initial purpose of first email was just an advise for new comers. My
fault was in that I was selected ext4 for SSD disks as backend.
But I did not foresee that inode number can reach its limit before the
free space :)
And maybe there must be some sort of warning not only for free space in
MiBs(GiBs,TiBs) and there must be dedicated warning about free inodes
for filesystems with static inode allocation like ext4.
Because if OSD reach inode limit it becames totally unusable and
immediately goes down, and from that moment there is no way to start it!
23.03.2015 13:42, Thomas Foster пишет:
You could fix this by changing your block size when formatting the
mount-point with the mkfs -b command. I had this same issue when
dealing with the filesystem using glusterfs and the solution is to
either use a filesystem that allocates inodes automatically or change
the block size when you build the filesystem. Unfortunately, the only
way to fix the problem that I have seen is to reformat
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Kamil Kuramshin
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
In my case there was cache pool for ec-pool serving RBD-images,
and object size is 4Mb, and client was an /kernel-rbd /client
each SSD disk is 60G disk, 2 disk per node, 6 nodes in total = 12
OSDs in total
23.03.2015 12:00, Christian Balzer пишет:
Hello,
This is rather confusing, as cache-tiers are just normal OSDs/pools and
thus should have Ceph objects of around 4MB in size by default.
This is matched on what I see with Ext4 here (normal OSD, not a cache
tier):
---
size:
/dev/sde1 2.7T 204G 2.4T 8% /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-0
inodes:
/dev/sde1 183148544 55654 183092890 1% /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-0
---
On a more fragmented cluster I see a 5:1 size to inode ratio.
I just can't fathom how there could be 3.3 million inodes (and thus a
close number of files) using 30G, making the average file size below 10
Bytes.
Something other than your choice of file system is probably at play here.
How fragmented are those SSDs?
What's your default Ceph object size?
Where _are_ those 3 million files in that OSD, are they actually in the
object files like:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4194304 Jan 9 15:27
/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-0/current/3.117_head/DIR_7/DIR_1/DIR_5/rb.0.23a8f.238e1f29.000000027632__head_C4F3D517__3
What's your use case, RBD, CephFS, RadosGW?
Regards,
Christian
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:32:55 +0300 Kamil Kuramshin wrote:
Recently got a problem with OSDs based on SSD disks used in cache tier
for EC-pool
superuser@node02:~$ df -i
Filesystem Inodes IUsed *IFree* IUse% Mounted on
<...>
/dev/sdb1 3335808 3335808 *0* 100%
/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45
/dev/sda1 3335808 3335808 *0* 100%
/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-46
Now that OSDs are down on each ceph-node and cache tiering is not
working.
superuser@node01:~$ sudo tail /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.45.log
2015-03-23 10:04:23.631137 7fb105345840 0 ceph version 0.87.1
(283c2e7cfa2457799f534744d7d549f83ea1335e), process ceph-osd, pid 1453465
2015-03-23 10:04:23.640676 7fb105345840 0
filestore(/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45) backend generic (magic 0xef53)
2015-03-23 10:04:23.640735 7fb105345840 -1
genericfilestorebackend(/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45) detect_features:
unable to create /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45/fiemap_test: (28) No space
left on device
2015-03-23 10:04:23.640763 7fb105345840 -1
filestore(/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45) _detect_fs: detect_features error:
(28) No space left on device
2015-03-23 10:04:23.640772 7fb105345840 -1
filestore(/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45) FileStore::mount : error in
_detect_fs: (28) No space left on device
2015-03-23 10:04:23.640783 7fb105345840 -1 ** ERROR: error converting
store /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45: (28) *No space left on device*
In the same time*df -h *is confusing:
superuser@node01:~$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used *Avail* Use% Mounted on
<...>
/dev/sda1 50G 29G *20G*
60% /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45 /dev/sdb1 50G 27G
*21G* 56% /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-46
Filesystem used on affected OSDs is EXt4. All OSDs are deployed with
ceph-deploy:
$ ceph-deploy osd create --zap-disk --fs-type ext4 <node-name>:<device>
Help me out what it was just test deployment and all EC-pool data was
lost since I /can't start OSDs/ and ceph cluster/becames degraded /until
I removed all affected tiered pools (cache & EC)
So this is just my observation of what kind of problems can be faced if
you choose wrong Filesystem for OSD backend.
And now I *strongly* recommend you to choose*XFS* or *Btrfs* filesystems
because both are supporting dynamic inode allocation and this problem
can't arise with them.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
