On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Gregory Farnum <[email protected]> wrote:
> Okay, but 118/85 = 1.38. You say you're seeing variance from 53%
> utilization to 96%, and 53%*1.38 = 73.5%, which is *way* off your
> numbers.

53% to 96% is with all weights set to default (i.e. disk size) and all
reweights set to 1.  (I.e. before reweight-by-utilization and many
hours of hand-tuning).

> But it might just be faster to look for
> anomalies within the size of important bits on the OSD — leveldb
> stores, etc that don't correspond to the PG count).

That would only work if I understood what you said and knew how to do it. :)

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to