might be true, yes - we had Intel 128GB (intel S3500 or S3700) - but these
have horrible random/sequetial speeds - Samsun 850 PROs are 3 times at
least faster on sequential, and more than 3 times faser on random/IOPS
measures.
And ofcourse modern enterprise drives = $$$$...

On 18 April 2015 at 12:42, Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkw...@catalyst.net.nz>
wrote:

> Yes, it sure is - my experience with 'consumer' SSD is that they die with
> obscure firmware bugs (wrong capacity, zero capacity, not detected in bios
> anymore) rather than flash wearout. It seems that the 'enterprise' tagged
> drives are less inclined to suffer this fate.
>
> Regards
>
> Mark
>
> On 18/04/15 22:23, Andrija Panic wrote:
>
>> these 2 drives, are on the regular SATA (on board)controler, and beside
>> this, there is 12 x 4TB on the fron of the servers - normal backplane on
>> the front.
>>
>> Anyway, we are going to check those dead SSDs on a pc/laptop or so,just
>> to confirm they are really dead - but this is the way they die, not wear
>> out, but simply show different space instead of real one - thse were 3
>> months old only when they died...
>>
>> On 18 April 2015 at 11:55, Josef Johansson <jose...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:jose...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     If the same chassi/chip/backplane is behind both drives and maybe
>>     other drives in the chassi have troubles,it may be a defect there as
>>     well.
>>
>>     On 18 Apr 2015 09:42, "Steffen W Sørensen" <ste...@me.com
>>     <mailto:ste...@me.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>          > On 17/04/2015, at 21.07, Andrija Panic
>>         <andrija.pa...@gmail.com <mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>          >
>>          > nah....Samsun 850 PRO 128GB - dead after 3months - 2 of these
>>         died... wearing level is 96%, so only 4% wasted... (yes I know
>>         these are not enterprise,etc… )
>>         Damn… but maybe your surname says it all - Don’t Panic :) But
>>         making sure same type of SSD devices ain’t of near same age and
>>         doing preventive replacement rotation might be good practice I
>>         guess.
>>
>>         /Steffen
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         ceph-users mailing list
>>         ceph-users@lists.ceph.com <mailto:ceph-users@lists.ceph.com>
>>         http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Andrija Panić
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>>
>


-- 

Andrija Panić
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to