...sorry clicked send to quickly /opt/ceph/bin/radosgw-admin orphans find --pool=.rgw.buckets --job-id=abcd ERROR: failed to open log pool ret=-2 job not found
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Anthony Alba <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Yehuda, > > First run: > > /opt/ceph/bin/radosgw-admin --pool=.rgw.buckets --job-id=testing > ERROR: failed to open log pool ret=-2 > job not found > > Do I have to precreate some pool? > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I've been working on a new tool that would detect leaked rados objects. It >> will take some time for it to be merged into an official release, or even >> into the master branch, but if anyone likes to play with it, it is in the >> wip-rgw-orphans branch. >> >> At the moment I recommend to not remove any object that the tool reports, >> but rather move it to a different pool for backup (using the rados tool cp >> command). >> >> The tool works in a few stages: >> (1) list all the rados objects in the specified pool, store in repository >> (2) list all bucket instances in the system, store in repository >> (3) iterate through bucket instances in repository, list (logical) objects, >> for each object store the expected rados objects that build it >> (4) compare data from (1) and (3), each object that is in (1), but not in >> (3), stat, if older than $start_time - $stale_period, report it >> >> There can be lot's of things that can go wrong with this, so we really need >> to be careful here. >> >> The tool can be run by the following command: >> >> $ radosgw-admin orphans find --pool=<data pool> --job-id=<name> >> [--num-shards=<num shards>] [--orphan-stale-secs=<seconds>] >> >> The tool can be stopped, and restarted, and it will continue from the stage >> where it stopped. Note that some of the stages will restart from the >> beginning (of the stages), due to system limitation (specifically 1, 2). >> >> In order to clean up a job's data: >> >> $ radosgw-admin orphans finish --job-id=<name> >> >> Note that the jobs run in the radosgw-admin process context, it does not >> schedule a job on the radosgw process. >> >> Please let me know of any issue you find. >> >> Thanks, >> Yehuda >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Ben Hines" <[email protected]> >>> To: "Ben" <[email protected]> >>> Cc: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" <[email protected]>, "ceph-users" >>> <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 3:00:16 PM >>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Shadow Files >>> >>> Going to hold off on our 94.1 update for this issue >>> >>> Hopefully this can make it into a 94.2 or a v95 git release. >>> >>> -Ben >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Ben < [email protected] > wrote: >>> >>> >>> How long are you thinking here? >>> >>> We added more storage to our cluster to overcome these issues, and we can't >>> keep throwing storage at it until the issues are fixed. >>> >>> >>> On 28/04/15 01:49, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: >>> >>> >>> It will get to the ceph mainline eventually. We're still reviewing and >>> testing the fix, and there's more work to be done on the cleanup tool. >>> >>> Yehuda >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>> >>> From: "Ben" <[email protected]> >>> To: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" < [email protected] > >>> Cc: "ceph-users" < [email protected] > >>> Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 11:02:23 PM >>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Shadow Files >>> >>> Are these fixes going to make it into the repository versions of ceph, >>> or will we be required to compile and install manually? >>> >>> On 2015-04-26 02:29, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: >>> >>> >>> Yeah, that's definitely something that we'd address soon. >>> >>> Yehuda >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>> >>> From: "Ben" <[email protected]> >>> To: "Ben Hines" < [email protected] >, "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" >>> < [email protected] > >>> Cc: "ceph-users" < [email protected] > >>> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 5:14:11 PM >>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Shadow Files >>> >>> Definitely need something to help clear out these old shadow files. >>> >>> I'm sure our cluster has around 100TB of these shadow files. >>> >>> I've written a script to go through known objects to get prefixes of >>> objects >>> that should exist to compare to ones that shouldn't, but the time it >>> takes >>> to do this over millions and millions of objects is just too long. >>> >>> On 25/04/15 09:53, Ben Hines wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> When these are fixed it would be great to get good steps for listing / >>> cleaning up any orphaned objects. I have suspicions this is affecting >>> us. >>> >>> thanks- >>> >>> -Ben >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub < >>> [email protected] > >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> These ones: >>> >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10295 >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11447 >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>> >>> From: "Ben Jackson" <[email protected]> >>> To: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" < [email protected] > >>> Cc: "ceph-users" < [email protected] > >>> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 3:06:02 PM >>> Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Shadow Files >>> >>> We were firefly, then we upgraded to giant, now we are on hammer. >>> >>> What issues? >>> >>> On 25 Apr 2015 2:12 am, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub < [email protected] > >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> What version are you running? There are two different issues that we >>> were >>> fixing this week, and we should have that upstream pretty soon. >>> >>> Yehuda >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> >>> >>> From: "Ben" <[email protected]> >>> To: "ceph-users" < [email protected] > >>> Cc: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" < [email protected] > >>> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:42:06 PM >>> Subject: [ceph-users] Shadow Files >>> >>> We are still experiencing a problem with out gateway not properly >>> clearing out shadow files. >>> >>> I have done numerous tests where I have: >>> -Uploaded a file of 1.5GB in size using s3browser application >>> -Done an object stat on the file to get its prefix >>> -Done rados ls -p .rgw.buckets | grep <prefix> to count the number >>> of >>> shadow files associated (in this case it is around 290 shadow files) >>> -Deleted said file with s3browser >>> -Performed a gc list, which shows the ~290 files listed >>> -Waited 24 hours to redo the rados ls -p .rgw.buckets | grep >>> <prefix> >>> to >>> recount the shadow files only to be left with 290 files still there >>> >>> From log output /var/log/ceph/radosgw.log, I can see the following >>> when >>> clicking DELETE (this appears 290 times) >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996523 7f0b0afb5700 0 >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): >>> result: ofs=4718592 stripe_ofs=4718592 part_ofs=0 rule->part_size=0 >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996557 7f0b0afb5700 0 >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): >>> result: ofs=8912896 stripe_ofs=8912896 part_ofs=0 rule->part_size=0 >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996564 7f0b0afb5700 0 >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): >>> result: ofs= 13107200 stripe_ofs= 13107200 part_ofs=0 >>> rule->part_size=0 >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996570 7f0b0afb5700 0 >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): >>> result: ofs=17301504 stripe_ofs=17301504 part_ofs=0 >>> rule->part_size=0 >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996576 7f0b0afb5700 0 >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): >>> result: ofs=21495808 stripe_ofs=21495808 part_ofs=0 >>> rule->part_size=0 >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996581 7f0b0afb5700 0 >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): >>> result: ofs=25690112 stripe_ofs=25690112 part_ofs=0 >>> rule->part_size=0 >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996586 7f0b0afb5700 0 >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): >>> result: ofs=29884416 stripe_ofs=29884416 part_ofs=0 >>> rule->part_size=0 >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996592 7f0b0afb5700 0 >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): >>> result: ofs=34078720 stripe_ofs=34078720 part_ofs=0 >>> rule->part_size=0 >>> >>> In this same log, I also see the gc process saying it is removing >>> said >>> file (these records appear 290 times too) >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.926952 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.928572 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.929636 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.930448 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.931226 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.932103 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.933470 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> >>> >>> So even though it appears that the GC is processing its removal, the >>> shadow files remain! >>> >>> Please help! >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ceph-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
