So with this, will even numbers then be LTS?  Since 9.0.0 is following
0.94.x/Hammer, and every other release is normally LTS, I'm guessing
10.x.x, 12.x.x, etc. will be LTS...

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Sage Weil <sw...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 5 May 2015, Joao Eduardo Luis wrote:
> > On 05/04/2015 05:09 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
> > > The first Ceph release back in Jan of 2008 was 0.1.  That made sense at
> > > the time.  We haven't revised the versioning scheme since then,
> however,
> > > and are now at 0.94.1 (first Hammer point release).  To avoid reaching
> > > 0.99 (and 0.100 or 1.00?) we have a new strategy.  This was discussed a
> > > bit on ceph-devel and in #ceph-devel and there doesn't appear to be any
> > > scheme that everyone likes.
> > >
> > > So, we're going to go with something that only a few people dislike:
> > >
> > >  x.0.z - development releases (for early testers and the brave at
> heart)
> > >  x.1.z - release candidates (for test clusters, brave users)
> > >  x.2.z - stable/bugfix releases (for users)
> > >
> > > x will start at 9 for Infernalis ("I" is the 9th letter), making our
> first
> > > development release of the 9th release cycle 9.0.0.  Subsequent
> > > development releases will be 9.0.1, 9.0.2, etc.
> > >
> > > In a couple months we'll have a 9.1.0 (and maybe 9.1.1) release
> candidate.
> > >
> > > A few weeks after that we'll have the Infernalis release 9.2.0,
> followed
> > > by stable bug fix updates 9.2.1, 9.2.2, etc., and then begin work on
> the
> > > Jewel (10.y.z) release.
> > >
> > > We'll see how this works out.  We can adjust this in the future to any
> > > other 9.y.z scheme (e.g., 9.1, 9.2 etc dev releases and 9.8.z stable
> > > releases); the main commitment here is to the 9 part, indicating
> > > Infernalis is the 9th major release cycle.
> >
> > Looks sane!
> >
> > I'm guessing once 9.1.0 is frozen the dev cycles will move on to 10.0.1?
>
> Yep!  Or 10.0.0 I guess since we just did 9.0.0.
>
> sage
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to