Hi Mark, I don¹t suppose you logged latency during those tests, did you?
I¹m one of the folks, as Bryan mentioned, that advocates turning these
values down. I¹m okay with extending recovery time, especially when we are
talking about a default of 3x replication, with the trade off of better
client response.

-- 
Warren Wang





On 6/1/15, 12:43 PM, "Mark Nelson" <mnel...@redhat.com> wrote:

>On 05/29/2015 04:47 PM, Samuel Just wrote:
>> Many people have reported that they need to lower the osd recovery
>>config options to minimize the impact of recovery on client io.  We are
>>talking about changing the defaults as follows:
>>
>> osd_max_backfills to 1 (from 10)
>> osd_recovery_max_active to 3 (from 15)
>> osd_recovery_op_priority to 1 (from 10)
>> osd_recovery_max_single_start to 1 (from 5)
>>
>> We'd like a bit of feedback first though.  Is anyone happy with the
>>current configs?  Is anyone using something between these values and the
>>current defaults?  What kind of workload?  I'd guess that lowering
>>osd_max_backfills to 1 is probably a good idea, but I wonder whether
>>lowering osd_recovery_max_active and osd_recovery_max_single_start will
>>cause small objects to recover unacceptably slowly.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
>We ran recovery tests last year around when firefly was released.  The
>basic gist of it was that as you increase client IO, the ratio of
>backfill to client IO changes for a given combination of priority
>settings.  IE you can tune around 10 15 10 5, or 1 3 1 1, but in each
>case the ratio of client to recovery IO appears to scale with the amount
>of client IO, even past the super saturation point.  I believe users
>will have a hard time finding optimal settings as clusters at the
>saturation point will behave differently than those in heavy
>super-saturation.
>
>
>http://nhm.ceph.com/Ceph_3XRep_Backfill_Recovery_Results.pdf
>http://nhm.ceph.com/Ceph_62EC_Backfill_Recovery_Results.pdf
>_______________________________________________
>ceph-users mailing list
>ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to