You're not really testing only a RBD device there - you're testing 1) the O_DIRECT implementation in the kernel version you have (they differ) - try different kernels in guest 2) cache implementation in qemu (and possibly virtio block driver) - if it's enabled - disable it for this test completely (cache=none) 3) O_DIRECT implementation on the filesystem where your "test" file is - most important is preallocation! - I'm not sure if you can "dd" into an existing file without truncating it, but you should first create the file with: dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=1M It's better to create a new virtual drive and attach it to this machine, then test it directly (and while dd is good for "baseline" testing, I recommend you use fio)
Btw I find the 4MB test pretty consistent, it seems to oscillate about ~50MB/s. In the beginning the cluster was probably busy doing something else (scrubbing? cleanup of something? cron scripts?). Jan > On 07 Aug 2015, at 03:31, Steve Dainard <sdain...@spd1.com> wrote: > > Trying to get an understanding why direct IO would be so slow on my cluster. > > Ceph 0.94.1 > 1 Gig public network > 10 Gig public network > 10 Gig cluster network > > 100 OSD's, 4T disk sizes, 5G SSD journal. > > As of this morning I had no SSD journal and was finding direct IO was > sub 10MB/s so I decided to add journals today. > > Afterwards I started running tests again and wasn't very impressed. > Then for no apparent reason the write speeds increased significantly. > But I'm finding they vary wildly. > > Currently there is a bit of background ceph activity, but only my > testing client has an rbd mapped/mounted: > election epoch 144, quorum 0,1,2 mon1,mon3,mon2 > osdmap e181963: 100 osds: 100 up, 100 in > flags noout > pgmap v2852566: 4144 pgs, 7 pools, 113 TB data, 29179 kobjects > 227 TB used, 135 TB / 363 TB avail > 4103 active+clean > 40 active+clean+scrubbing > 1 active+clean+scrubbing+deep > > Tests: > 1M block size: http://pastebin.com/LKtsaHrd throughput has no consistency > 4k block size: http://pastebin.com/ib6VW9eB thoughput is amazingly consistent > > Thoughts? > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
