Jan,

  sorry, I misundestood "TBW" definition. It's still a little bit better
(1.33 DWPD) than 0.8 DWPD but much worse than I thought. So it means $0.41
per TB written for pm863 and $0.105 per TB written for sm863 which is just
terrible in comparison with Intel drives.

Best regards,
Vladimir Drobyshevskiy


С уважением,
Дробышевский Владимир
Компания "АйТи Город"
+7 343 2222192
ICQ# - 1921011

Аппаратное и программное обеспечение
IBM, Microsoft, Eset
Поставка проектов "под ключ"
Аутсорсинг ИТ-услуг

2015-08-25 18:35 GMT+05:00 Jan Schermer <[email protected]>:

> I can't really comment on price, I haven't found them anywhere maybe
> because they are pretty fresh but I think I read they are oem-only to sell
> in complete systems. That doesn't mean they can't be bought of course.
>
> I was commenting on DWPD of PM863 - at 0.8 DWPD that's pretty terrible and
> at least in my cluster it would die a horrible death...
> Keep in mind that when you start approaching the cell lifetime you will
> get a lot more CRC errors, lot more corrupted (undetectable!) sectors and
> some of the errors can go undetected until another drive fails (which is
> when you read the most).
> And do you really want to change all the drives yearly?
> I don't think this SSD is suitable for any server for storage, maybe for
> OS or some read-intensive tasks...
>
> Jan
>
>
> On 25 Aug 2015, at 15:26, Дробышевский, Владимир <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Jan, thanks for the opinion!
>
> Do you think that 5.11 DWPD is terrible? For example, Intel S3610 has 3
> DWPD or 5475 TBW (but for 5 years, of course).
> For 1.6TB Intel S3610 it means ~$0.175 per TB written. For pm863 3.84TB
> the price per TB written will be ~$0.108. And more than twice capacity per
> drive bay ratio.
>
> For sm863 1.84TB it's even better: $0.057 per TB written. Actually, it's
> better than for Intel S3710 1.2TB: $0.081 per TB written for Intel. But
> s3710 has better speed specs of course (the only problem that we have not
> enough CPU speed for such IOPS, I think).
>
> I found Intel prices on http://google.com/shopping (the lowest ones) and
> the only one price I was able to find for Samsung - through "Where to Buy"
> on the Samsung website.
> For Intel prices were:
> s3610 1.6TB - $1530 ($0.96 per GB of capacity)
> s3710 1.2TB - $1780 ($1.49 per GB)
>
> For Samsung:
> pm863 3.84TB - $2328 ($0.61 per GB)
> sm863 1.92TB - $1324 ($0.69 per GB)
>
> As far as I know these are retail products (they are listed on Samsung
> Business SSD section) but they aren't avaliable in my country and Support
> said nothing about timescales.
>
> But I belive these SSDs will be avaliable in Europe and USA soon so I
> consider them as an alternative to Intel drives for the new cluster I'm
> working on. The only question is real speed.
>
> Best regards,
> Vladimir Drobyshevskiy
>
> 2015-08-25 16:56 GMT+05:00 Jan Schermer <[email protected]>:
>
>> pm863 has terrible DWPD, I wouldn't even consider it.
>> sm863 is better and could be worthwile
>>
>> But I think both of these are OEM-only. Or can you buy them in bulk
>> somewhere?
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
>> > On 25 Aug 2015, at 12:18, Дробышевский, Владимир <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> >   For a few months I'm looking for any news about new VNAND Samsung
>> sm863 \ pm863 SSDs. A couple of weeks ago it's finally appeared on the
>> Samsung web-site. Final specs look very interesting:
>> >
>> > sm863: up to 1.92GB, 520 / 485 mb/s sequential read / write, 97k / 29k
>> random IOPS, cas latency 100, warranty: 5 years and 12320 TBW, suggested
>> retail price $1260 (1.92TB model)
>> >
>> > pm863: up to 3.84GB, 540 / 480 mb/s sequential read / write, 99k / 18k
>> random IOPS, cas latency 170, warranty: 3 years and 5600 TBW, suggested
>> retail price $2200 (3.84TB model)
>> >
>> >   So I would like to ask: has anybody got it yet and did any tests
>> (ceph tests preferably)?
>> >
>> >   Thanks!
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Vladimir Drobyshevskiy
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ceph-users mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to