Can you bump up debug (debug rgw = 20, debug ms = 1), and see if the
operations (bucket listing and bucket check) go into some kind of
infinite loop?

Yehuda

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Sam Wouters <s...@ericom.be> wrote:
> Hi, I've started the bucket --check --fix on friday evening and it's
> still running. 'ceph -s' shows the cluster health as OK, I don't know if
> there is anything else I could check? Is there a way of finding out if
> its actually doing something?
>
> We only have this issue on the one bucket with versioning enabled, I
> can't get rid of the feeling it has something todo with that. The
> "underscore bug" is also still present on that bucket
> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12819). Not sure if thats related in any
> way.
> Are there any alternatives, as for example copy all the objects into a
> new bucket without versioning? Simple way would be to list the objects
> and copy them to a new bucket, but bucket listing is not working so...
>
> -Sam
>
>
> On 31-08-15 10:47, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>> This generally shouldn't be a problem at your bucket sizes. Have you
>> checked that the cluster is actually in a healthy state? The sleeping
>> locks are normal but should be getting woken up; if they aren't it
>> means the object access isn't working for some reason. A down PG or
>> something would be the simplest explanation.
>> -Greg
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Sam Wouters <s...@ericom.be> wrote:
>>> Ok, maybe I'm to impatient. It would be great if there were some verbose
>>> or progress logging of the radosgw-admin tool.
>>> I will start a check and let it run over the weekend.
>>>
>>> tnx,
>>> Sam
>>>
>>> On 28-08-15 18:16, Sam Wouters wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> this bucket only has 13389 objects, so the index size shouldn't be a
>>>> problem. Also, on the same cluster we have an other bucket with 1200543
>>>> objects (but no versioning configured), which has no issues.
>>>>
>>>> when we run a radosgw-admin bucket --check (--fix), nothing seems to be
>>>> happening. Putting an strace on the process shows a lot of lines like 
>>>> these:
>>>> [pid 99372] futex(0x2d730d4, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 156619, NULL
>>>> <unfinished ...>
>>>> [pid 99385] futex(0x2da9410, FUTEX_WAIT_PRIVATE, 2, NULL <unfinished ...>
>>>> [pid 99371] futex(0x2da9410, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1 <unfinished ...>
>>>> [pid 99385] <... futex resumed> )       = -1 EAGAIN (Resource
>>>> temporarily unavailable)
>>>> [pid 99371] <... futex resumed> )       = 0
>>>>
>>>> but no errors in the ceph logs or health warnings.
>>>>
>>>> r,
>>>> Sam
>>>>
>>>> On 28-08-15 17:49, Ben Hines wrote:
>>>>> How many objects in the bucket?
>>>>>
>>>>> RGW has problems with index size once number of objects gets into the
>>>>> 900000+ level. The buckets need to be recreated with 'sharded bucket
>>>>> indexes' on:
>>>>>
>>>>> rgw override bucket index max shards = 23
>>>>>
>>>>> You could also try repairing the index with:
>>>>>
>>>>>  radosgw-admin bucket check --fix --bucket=<bucketname>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Ben
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Sam Wouters <s...@ericom.be> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> we have a rgw bucket (with versioning) where PUT and GET operations for
>>>>>> specific objects succeed,  but retrieving an object list fails.
>>>>>> Using python-boto, after a timeout just gives us an 500 internal error;
>>>>>> radosgw-admin just hangs.
>>>>>> Also a radosgw-admin bucket check just seems to hang...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ceph version is 0.94.3 but this also was happening with 0.94.2, we
>>>>>> quietly hoped upgrading would fix but it didn't...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> r,
>>>>>> Sam
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to